NICE Rejects Donanemab for NHS Use Due to Cost Concerns

By João L. Carapinha

October 24, 2024

The article from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on the new Alzheimer’s treatment donanemab highlights several key points regarding the decision not to recommend this drug for use in the NHS. Essentially, donanemab has faced rejection due to concerns over its cost-effectiveness and the limited benefits it provides.

Reason for the Donanemab NHS rejection

NICE has determined that donanemab “does not currently demonstrate value for the NHS.” The NHS based this decision primarily on the drug’s cost-effectiveness; they saw its benefits to patients as too minimal to warrant the significant additional costs. The cost-effectiveness estimate for donanemab is five to six times above the threshold that NICE typically considers acceptable for NHS resources.

Clinical Benefits

While donanemab, manufactured by Eli Lilly, has shown potential to slow cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s patients, the observed benefits are relatively small. Clinical trials indicate that donanemab could result in a delay of cognitive decline by four to seven months. However, NICE’s independent committee concluded that this improvement is not adequate to justify the high costs associated with the treatment.

Regulatory Approval

Despite NICE’s decision, donanemab has received approval from the UK’s medicines regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), for use within the UK. This approval is significant as it highlights the drug’s safety and efficacy, but it does not change NICE’s assessment regarding its cost-effectiveness for NHS use.

Impact on Patients and Carers

The rejection of donanemab for NHS use is a considerable setback for patients with early-stage Alzheimer’s and their carers. Advocates argue that drugs like donanemab, along with another rejected treatment called lecanemab, represent the first chance to effectively slow the decline in memory and cognitive abilities associated with Alzheimer’s, rather than merely addressing symptoms. Consequently, the decision may restrict access to these therapies to individuals who can afford private treatment.

Future Implications

This decision raises alarms that the UK could become a less appealing market for launching new dementia treatments due to strict cost-effectiveness standards. Organizations such as Alzheimer’s Research UK and various charities have urged the Health Secretary to take action and initiate discussions among NICE, NHS England, and the pharmaceutical industry. Policymakers aim to ensure that patients with dementia can access new treatments and receive proper attention in the healthcare system.

Ongoing Research and Development

NICE acknowledges that this is an emerging area of medicine and that further treatments are currently being researched. The agency emphasizes that more comprehensive evidence is needed on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of donanemab, suggesting that future reassessments could occur if additional data become available.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Advancing Collaborative TB Innovation to Tackle Drug Resistance

By João L. Carapinha

March 24, 2026

Collaborative TB Innovation is essential to ending the world’s deadliest infectious disease. Tuberculosis (TB) still claims millions of lives each year, with rising drug resistance, climate-driven migration, and conflict severely undermining global progress. While the burden falls heaviest on low...
Citation Analysis of Real-World Evidence in Medicare Drug Price Negotiations
Medicare Drug Price Negotiations are increasingly relying on real-world evidence, according to a new citation analysis of the first drugs selected under the Inflation Reduction Act. The study examined how the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) uses real-world evidence (RWE) in its M...
Serplulimab Lung Cancer Treatment: Evaluation of Clinical and Economic Impact in Portugal
Serplulimab lung cancer treatment has received a positive funding recommendation from Portuguese authorities for first-line use in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), despite not demonstrating added therapeutic value over the current standard. No Added Therapeutic Value...