
A study on medicine shortages in the Netherlands found that disease and costs were the two most affected elements, with 30% and 20% of shortages rated high on these elements, respectively. The study used a framework of economic, clinical, and patient outcomes to assess the impact of medicine shortages on patients. Direct impact, represented by alternative product and disease, was rated high for 30% of the shortages, while indirect impact, represented by costs, susceptibility, and number of patients, was rated high for 17% of the shortages. No significant differences in impact scores were found based on product characteristics.
Recent Posts
Driving Economic Transformation through Brain Health Investment in Africa
The Johannesburg Communiqué from the Africa Task Force on Brain Health declares that investing in brain health is crucial, as it supports Africa’s economic transformation and Agenda 2063 goals while covering dementia, mental health, brain trauma, and substance abuse. This investment aligns with N...
NICE Endorses Natalizumab RRMS Treatment Expansion for Refractory Cases
NICE Expands Access to Natalizumab RRMS Treatment for Highly Active Cases
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued final draft guidance recommending natalizumab RRMS treatment o...
Johnson & Johnson’s EMA Application for Teclistamab Daratumumab Therapy: A New Hope fo...
Wondering how teclistamab daratumumab therapy could change treatment options for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma? Johnson & Johnson recently filed a Type II variation application with the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which seeks to expand TECVAYLI® (teclistamab) combined with DARZALE...