
A study on medicine shortages in the Netherlands found that disease and costs were the two most affected elements, with 30% and 20% of shortages rated high on these elements, respectively. The study used a framework of economic, clinical, and patient outcomes to assess the impact of medicine shortages on patients. Direct impact, represented by alternative product and disease, was rated high for 30% of the shortages, while indirect impact, represented by costs, susceptibility, and number of patients, was rated high for 17% of the shortages. No significant differences in impact scores were found based on product characteristics.
Recent Posts

Prioritizing a Comprehensive Medtech Market Access Strategy Through Stakeholder Engagement
An effective medtech market access strategy must begin at the concept stage by simultaneously addressing patient needs, clinical workflows, regulatory requirements, and payer expectations rather than defaulting to FDA clearance as the sole priority. Startups that ignore this broader view risk bui...

Potential for Advancements in HIV Weekly Treatment Options
HIV Weekly Treatment Options took a major step forward as Gilead and Merck reported that their investigational once-weekly combination of islatravir and lenacapavir successfully met the primary endpoint in two Phase 3 trials. The oral regimen maintained viral suppression in adults already control...

Tovorafenib Clinical Assessment Outcomes and Methodological Challenges
The Tovorafenib clinical assessment conducted under the EU Joint Clinical Assessment process has exposed critical shortcomings in the evidence base for treating BRAF-altered pediatric low-grade glioma. Despite the therapy’s potential, reviewers concluded that robust comparative data is absent for...