
A study on medicine shortages in the Netherlands found that disease and costs were the two most affected elements, with 30% and 20% of shortages rated high on these elements, respectively. The study used a framework of economic, clinical, and patient outcomes to assess the impact of medicine shortages on patients. Direct impact, represented by alternative product and disease, was rated high for 30% of the shortages, while indirect impact, represented by costs, susceptibility, and number of patients, was rated high for 17% of the shortages. No significant differences in impact scores were found based on product characteristics.
Recent Posts

Biologic Dispensing Implementation Gaps Challenge Patient Access to Care
Biologic dispensing implementation gaps are undermining equitable access to advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease across Portugal’s public hospitals. Despite clear legislative changes, institutions continue to reject prescriptions for biologics written by private specialists, forcing ...

Curative Therapy Commercialization Gap and Global Access Challenges
The curative therapy commercialization gap remains one of healthcare’s most stubborn contradictions: cell and gene therapies can deliver complete disease resolution, yet structural, financial, and infrastructural barriers keep them from reaching most patients who need them. This disconnect is esp...

Transatlantic Reference Pricing Innovation and Its Impact on Global Pharmaceutical Dynamics
The transatlantic reference pricing innovation is fundamentally altering pharmaceutical revenue expectations and patient access on both sides of the Atlantic. By anchoring U.S. reimbursement to the second-lowest net price among a basket of wealthy nations, the Most Favored Nation (MFN) policy cre...