
A study on medicine shortages in the Netherlands found that disease and costs were the two most affected elements, with 30% and 20% of shortages rated high on these elements, respectively. The study used a framework of economic, clinical, and patient outcomes to assess the impact of medicine shortages on patients. Direct impact, represented by alternative product and disease, was rated high for 30% of the shortages, while indirect impact, represented by costs, susceptibility, and number of patients, was rated high for 17% of the shortages. No significant differences in impact scores were found based on product characteristics.
Recent Posts

Delpacibart Braxlosiran FSHD Shows Promise in Disease Modification
Novartis has achieved a key clinical milestone with delpacibart braxlosiran FSHD, as its FORTITUDE biomarker cohort successfully met the primary endpoint by substantially suppressing DUX4-driven gene expression and reducing muscle damage markers in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystr...

Advancing Athlete Risk Stratification with Predictive Frameworks
Athlete risk stratification now integrates epidemiological evidence, explainable artificial intelligence, and mechanistic cardiac models to better protect young competitors. This convergence offers a path to distinguish healthy athletic remodeling from hidden substrates that can trigger fatal arr...

Evaluating Innovative Therapies Access in Portugal
According to Paulo Gonçalves in the APIFARMA newsletter, Innovative Therapies Access in Portugal directs resources toward therapeutic innovation at levels substantially below feasible ambitions. Protracted authorization processes impose measurab...