
A study on medicine shortages in the Netherlands found that disease and costs were the two most affected elements, with 30% and 20% of shortages rated high on these elements, respectively. The study used a framework of economic, clinical, and patient outcomes to assess the impact of medicine shortages on patients. Direct impact, represented by alternative product and disease, was rated high for 30% of the shortages, while indirect impact, represented by costs, susceptibility, and number of patients, was rated high for 17% of the shortages. No significant differences in impact scores were found based on product characteristics.
Recent Posts

Cancer Productivity Disparities in the Asia-Pacific Region
New research exposes a deepening divide in cancer productivity Asia-Pacific, where middle-income countries face rapidly escalating productivity losses from premature cancer deaths and disability, while high-income economies have begun to stabilise their burdens. Between 2010 and 2022, indirect ec...

Generative AI Diagnosis in Neurology Enhances Non-Specialist Accuracy
Generative AI diagnosis is stepping into neurology with striking results. In a new study, ChatGPT-4o reached 65.5% accuracy for the correct leading diagnosis in challenging polyneuropathy cases, statistically matching non-specialist neurologists (63%) while trailing specialists (74%). The model o...

Enhancing Tuberculosis Outcomes Through Counselling Incentives
Tuberculosis counselling incentives that combine conditional cash transfers with structured pre- and post-test counselling are proving highly effective at overcoming socioeconomic barriers to treatment adherence. This integrated strategy reduces long-term disease transmission while requiring only...