
A study on medicine shortages in the Netherlands found that disease and costs were the two most affected elements, with 30% and 20% of shortages rated high on these elements, respectively. The study used a framework of economic, clinical, and patient outcomes to assess the impact of medicine shortages on patients. Direct impact, represented by alternative product and disease, was rated high for 30% of the shortages, while indirect impact, represented by costs, susceptibility, and number of patients, was rated high for 17% of the shortages. No significant differences in impact scores were found based on product characteristics.
Recent Posts

Tovorafenib Clinical Assessment Outcomes and Methodological Challenges
The Tovorafenib clinical assessment conducted under the EU Joint Clinical Assessment process has exposed critical shortcomings in the evidence base for treating BRAF-altered pediatric low-grade glioma. Despite the therapy’s potential, reviewers concluded that robust comparative data is absent for...

Transformative Impact of Levacetylleucine A-T Treatment in Rare Neurodegenerative Disease
Levacetylleucine A-T treatment has delivered compelling Phase III results, producing statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in ataxia severity and daily function for both pediatric and adult patients with ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T). The

Insulin Cost Policy Impact on Medicare Beneficiaries
The Insulin Cost Policy Impact became clear in 2023 after the Inflation Reduction Act limited out-of-pocket insulin expenses to $35 per 30-day supply for Medicare Part D beneficiaries. According to a JAMA Network study, the c...