
A study on medicine shortages in the Netherlands found that disease and costs were the two most affected elements, with 30% and 20% of shortages rated high on these elements, respectively. The study used a framework of economic, clinical, and patient outcomes to assess the impact of medicine shortages on patients. Direct impact, represented by alternative product and disease, was rated high for 30% of the shortages, while indirect impact, represented by costs, susceptibility, and number of patients, was rated high for 17% of the shortages. No significant differences in impact scores were found based on product characteristics.
Recent Posts
Biopharma Ecosystem Competitiveness: Post-COVID Challenges and Opportunities
Biopharma Ecosystem Competitiveness in Global Race
A new EFPIA analysis compares bioph...
EMA Validation of ENHERTU Breast Cancer Treatment for Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy
EMA Validates ENHERTU Breast Cancer Treatment Variation
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has validated a Type II Variation marketing authorization application for ENHERTU breast cancer treatment, specifically ENHERTU (trast...
NICE Updates Type 2 Diabetes Guidelines: Emphasizing Cardiorenal Protection with SGLT2 Inhibitors
Type 2 Diabetes Guidelines Reshape Initial Treatment
The latest Type 2 Diabetes Guidelines from NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), published on 18 February 2026 as an update to guideline NG28 ("Type 2 diabe...