Deadline Boosts Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in TEMPO Trial

By João L. Carapinha

March 17, 2025

Are deadlines the secret to increasing colorectal cancer screening rates? The TEMPO trial, a nationwide randomized controlled trial in Scotland, evaluated the impact of two behavioral interventions on colorectal cancer screening uptake. These interventions included adding a deadline for returning faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) and using a problem-solving planning tool. The study found that including a deadline in the invitation letter significantly increased timely FIT returns and reduced the need for reminder letters. The planning tool had no positive effect. A 2-week deadline was identified as the most effective and acceptable option.

Key Insights from the TEMPO Trial

  • Deadline Effectiveness. Adding a deadline to the FIT invitation letter increased timely returns and reduced the need for reminder letters. The 2-week deadline was particularly effective in enhancing colorectal cancer screening rates.
  • Planning Tool Ineffectiveness. The planning tool did not improve FIT return rates and was even detrimental when used without a deadline.
  • Cost-Effectiveness. The deadline intervention is highly cost-effective, requiring minimal additional resources.

Understanding the Colorectal Screening Landscape

Colorectal cancer screening uptake is suboptimal globally, with about 50% participation in European FIT programs. Interventions like deadlines and planning tools could enhance participation. The TEMPO trial is the first to assess these interventions within a nationwide screening program.

Strategic Implications and Future Directions

Implementing deadlines could increase FIT returns and potentially save lives by facilitating earlier detection of colorectal cancer. Reducing reminder letters can lead to substantial cost savings for screening programs. Further studies should explore the effectiveness of deadlines in other screening contexts. They should also assess potential barriers to implementation, such as literacy levels and language barriers. For more insights into the effectiveness of these interventions, you can explore the article on The Lancet’s website here.

Reference url

Recent Posts

New Federal Actions to Combat Misleading Prescription Drug Ads in 2025

By João L. Carapinha

September 11, 2025

Misleading prescription drug ads have become a pressing concern in the United States, prompting decisive federal action. What are the new measures targeting deceptive pharmaceutical advertising, and how will these changes affect public health and healthcare costs? In September 2025, a
Ending Unproven Fertility Treatments: NICE Calls for Evidence-Based Care in Clinics

By João L. Carapinha

September 10, 2025

Unproven fertility treatments—a term referring to add-on procedures without robust clinical evidence—have come under renewed scrutiny in the UK. Many prospective parents want to know: Why are unproven fertility treatments being discouraged, and what does this mean for fertility clinic choices...
Medicare ACO Outcomes: Balancing Surgical Benefits and Costs Under the TEAM Model

By João L. Carapinha

September 9, 2025

Medicare ACO outcomes are a major focus for clinicians, policymakers, and researchers seeking to understand how Accountable Care Organization (ACO) assignment influences patient results and healthcare costs after surgery. Are ACOs improving quality and saving money for Medicare patients undergoin...