NICE Rejects Donanemab for NHS Use Due to Cost Concerns

By João L. Carapinha

October 24, 2024

The article from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on the new Alzheimer’s treatment donanemab highlights several key points regarding the decision not to recommend this drug for use in the NHS. Essentially, donanemab has faced rejection due to concerns over its cost-effectiveness and the limited benefits it provides.

Reason for the Donanemab NHS rejection

NICE has determined that donanemab “does not currently demonstrate value for the NHS.” The NHS based this decision primarily on the drug’s cost-effectiveness; they saw its benefits to patients as too minimal to warrant the significant additional costs. The cost-effectiveness estimate for donanemab is five to six times above the threshold that NICE typically considers acceptable for NHS resources.

Clinical Benefits

While donanemab, manufactured by Eli Lilly, has shown potential to slow cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s patients, the observed benefits are relatively small. Clinical trials indicate that donanemab could result in a delay of cognitive decline by four to seven months. However, NICE’s independent committee concluded that this improvement is not adequate to justify the high costs associated with the treatment.

Regulatory Approval

Despite NICE’s decision, donanemab has received approval from the UK’s medicines regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), for use within the UK. This approval is significant as it highlights the drug’s safety and efficacy, but it does not change NICE’s assessment regarding its cost-effectiveness for NHS use.

Impact on Patients and Carers

The rejection of donanemab for NHS use is a considerable setback for patients with early-stage Alzheimer’s and their carers. Advocates argue that drugs like donanemab, along with another rejected treatment called lecanemab, represent the first chance to effectively slow the decline in memory and cognitive abilities associated with Alzheimer’s, rather than merely addressing symptoms. Consequently, the decision may restrict access to these therapies to individuals who can afford private treatment.

Future Implications

This decision raises alarms that the UK could become a less appealing market for launching new dementia treatments due to strict cost-effectiveness standards. Organizations such as Alzheimer’s Research UK and various charities have urged the Health Secretary to take action and initiate discussions among NICE, NHS England, and the pharmaceutical industry. Policymakers aim to ensure that patients with dementia can access new treatments and receive proper attention in the healthcare system.

Ongoing Research and Development

NICE acknowledges that this is an emerging area of medicine and that further treatments are currently being researched. The agency emphasizes that more comprehensive evidence is needed on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of donanemab, suggesting that future reassessments could occur if additional data become available.

Reference url

Recent Posts

elderly care costs 2025
      

Elderly Care Costs 2025: Rising Financial Pressures in Dutch Health Services

💡 Are you prepared for the surge in elderly care costs projected for 2025?

A recent report from Zorginstituut Nederland reveals that the financial burden on the Dutch health system is set to rise significantly due to demographic shifts and increased demand for complex care. As policymakers navigate these challenges, the insights address crucial implications for health economics, reimbursement strategies, and sustainable access to care.

Don’t miss out on understanding how these trends could shape the future of healthcare. Dive into the full article for comprehensive insights!

#SyenzaNews #HealthEconomics #HealthcarePolicy #DigitalTransformation

silencing science impact
      

Silencing Science Impact: Political Interference and Global Health Consequences

🔍 Are political interventions threatening the very foundation of scientific integrity?

A recent article from the BMJ highlights alarming shifts within U.S. governance that are undermining scientific autonomy, equity in health research, and public trust. From funding cuts to the suppression of critical fields like climate science, the implications are far-reaching.

Curious about how these changes may affect the future of healthcare and innovative reimbursement? Dive into the full discussion to understand the stakes and potential solutions.

#SyenzaNews #HealthEconomics #HealthcarePolicy

AAP childhood obesity guidelines
     

Caution Advised: Conflicts in AAP Childhood Obesity Guidelines

Are childhood obesity guidelines driving us toward conflict? 🌍 The recent AAP guidelines suggest weight loss medications for children as young as eight, but undisclosed financial ties to drug manufacturers raise serious questions about credibility.

In this article, we dive into the implications of these conflicts and the evidence gaps surrounding pharmaceutical interventions in pediatric care. Transparency and trust are crucial when it comes to the health of our children—let’s explore what needs to change.

Read more to find out how these guidelines could impact families, clinicians, and healthcare policy.

#SyenzaNews #HealthcareInnovation #HealthcarePolicy

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

JOIN NEWSLETTER

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.