Strategic Vision and Infarmed 2026 Priorities for Regulatory Reform

By João L. Carapinha

February 12, 2026

Infarmed 2026 Priorities Take Shape in Leadership Summit

Infarmed 2026 priorities crystallized during the Executive Board’s February 11, 2026, session with unit directors, led by President Rui Santos Ivo, Vice-President Raquel Ascenção, and Board Member Eduardo Costa. This followed the agency’s 33rd anniversary Advisory Council on January 15, amid statutory updates and a 416-strong workforce. Core themes: process simplification, digital transformation, and proportional regulation to safeguard public health while accelerating access to medicines and technologies.

Simplification and Digital Overhaul

Infarmed 2026 priorities spotlight process simplification, digitalization of procedures, and boosted organizational productivity. Examples include functional reorganization to streamline decisions and optimize resources, cutting response times with risk-based oversight. This internal agility serves citizens, professionals, and industry, fostering a knowledge-sharing culture to deliver maximum value—especially to the National Health Service—via collaborative unit innovation.

Advisory Council Momentum

The January 15 extraordinary Advisory Council introduced the new board to partners like the Health Directorate-General, health systems administration, professional orders, and patient groups. President Ivo reviewed 2025 wins and 2026 visions, joined by Secretary of State Ana Povo on SiNATS sustainability and Professor Arlindo Oliveira on transformative technologies. This stakeholder input shapes Infarmed 2026 priorities, including EU rules on medical devices, in vitro diagnostics, and medicine reserves.

Health Economics and Market Impact

Infarmed 2026 priorities may streamline SiNATS evaluations for faster market access, and reimbursement. Proportional, sustainable regulation eases pharma burdens, aligns with EU reforms for swift approvals, and bolsters Portugal’s EU health policy role. With workforce investments, it enhances post-market surveillance, tech assessment, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Closing the East-West Divide: Addressing Healthcare Investment Disparities in Central and Eastern...

By João L. Carapinha

April 14, 2026

A recent study commissioned by EFPIA and authored by leading CEE academics—Dr. Slaveyko Djambazov, Dr. Luka Voncina, Dr. Aleš Rod, and Dr. Marcin Czech—reveals that despite accelerated public health spending growth in several CEE countries, structural underinvestment persists. This produces marke...
Safeguarding Access: Navigating Pharmaceutical Cost Pressures in Portugal

By João L. Carapinha

April 13, 2026

Pharmaceutical cost pressures are mounting in Portugal, with industry leaders warning that price increases for certain medicines appear inevitable in the medium term despite the government’s commitment to strict controls in the 2026 annual review. Global Cost Drivers Threaten Generic...
Inequality-Adjusted ICER: Enhancing Cost-Effectiveness in Health Technology Evaluation
The inequality-adjusted ICER offers a practical way to embed explicit trade-offs between maximising total population health and reducing health inequality directly into cost-effectiveness analysis. By dividing the conventional ICER by an inequality-adjusted ICER, analysts derive a health inequali...