Willingness to Pay for Innovative Oncology Treatments
By Staff Writer
March 16, 2024
Introduction
Cancer remains a significant global public health concern, with approximately 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million deaths reported worldwide in 2018. Access to innovative oncology treatments is crucial in improving patient prognosis and quality of life. However, the high cost of these treatments often poses a barrier, particularly in lower-middle-income countries like Malaysia. This article explores the willingness of Malaysians to pay for these innovative treatments and how this information can be used to shape more sustainable funding solutions.
The Cost of Oncology Treatment
The financial burden of cancer treatment has seen a dramatic increase over the years. In many instances, the high cost of new oncology medicines that could potentially improve survival rates renders them unaffordable. Consequently, they are not listed in the Ministry of Health Malaysia Formulary. The financial strain often forces patients to pay out-of-pocket to access these new treatments, leading to potential economic hardships.
The Funding Challenge and Need for Innovative Solutions
In Malaysia, several foundations and non-governmental agencies occasionally provide funding assistance for cancer therapies. However, these funds are often insufficient, posing a barrier to early access to innovative oncology medicine. Therefore, there is a pressing need for innovative funding mechanisms involving multiple parties, such as healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, patients, non-government organisations, and other funding bodies.
Willingness to Pay for Innovative Oncology Treatments
A recent study sought to determine whether Malaysians are willing to pay for innovative oncology medicines and the amount they would be willing to pay for early access to treatment. The research was done in three hospitals in Malaysia, and also online from January 2021 to January 2022. Participants were given three hypothetical scenarios where they had to decide how much they would be willing to pay for a new diabetes medicine (IDM), a one-time payment for a new cancer medicine (IOMO), and an annual insurance premium for access to new cancer medicines (IOMI).
Table 1. Mean Willingness to Pay Amount.
The results revealed that on average, for the first model (IDM), people were willing to pay around MYR134.06 per month. The study found that older individuals and those from Sabah/Sarawak were willing to pay a little more. Also, people with higher incomes (over MYR10,001) were willing to pay significantly more.
For the second model (IOMO), the average amount people were willing to pay was MYR279.10 per dose. Here, people with higher incomes again were willing to pay more, and married individuals also tended to pay more.
For the third model (IOMI), the average amount people were willing to pay was MYR150.09 per year. In this case, only those with higher incomes were willing to pay more.
Implications and Conclusion
The results from this study can help shape collaborative funding mechanisms for cancer care in Malaysia. It is essential to introduce appropriate financial screening in public hospitals to categorise patients based on their financial hardship and channel them to suitable financial assistance. Moreover, the results underscore the need for more education and marketing initiatives to highlight the benefits of medical and health insurance, especially for covering innovative cancer medicine.
🌟 What does the EMA’s orphan drug designation for allopurinol mean for those impacted by Marfan syndrome?
This groundbreaking move highlights a significant step forward in tackling rare diseases, offering hope to patients with limited treatment options. Allopurinol, traditionally used for gout, shows promise in addressing life-threatening aortic complications associated with Marfan syndrome, thanks to its antioxidant properties.
Dive into the implications of this development for healthcare innovation, patient access, and the future of rare disease treatment!
💡 Are we witnessing a paradigm shift in hemophilia treatment?
The recent recommendation from NICE for marstacimab as a novel therapy for severe hemophilia B is a game-changer. With its ability to provide effective prophylaxis while potentially lowering treatment costs, this could reshape patient care and health economics in this space.
Dive into the implications this has for patients and healthcare providers, and why marstacimab’s approval could be a pivotal moment for hemophilia management.
🌍 Are we witnessing a rise in HPV-related cancer in South Africa?
A recent analysis of data from the South African National Cancer Registry highlights concerning trends: while cervical cancer rates are declining, there’s an alarming rise in non-cervical anogenital cancers. This underscores the urgent need for enhanced cancer prevention and access to efficient healthcare services in the country.
Dive into the findings and explore the implications for health systems and policies.
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.
