The World Health Organization (WHO) has released new guidance on the ethics and governance of large multi-modal models (LMMs), which are generative AI technologies that have the potential to improve healthcare outcomes. The guidance includes over 40 recommendations for governments, technology companies, and healthcare providers to ensure the appropriate use of LMMs. LMMs are unique in their ability to accept various types of data inputs, such as text, videos, and images, and generate diverse outputs. They mimic human communication and can perform tasks that they were not explicitly programmed to do. These technologies have been adopted at an unprecedented rate, with platforms like ChatGPT, Bard, and Bert gaining popularity in 2023. This article will discuss WHO’s Guidance of Ethics and Governance AI Usage.
Guiding AI’s Role in Healthcare
The potential benefits of LMMs in healthcare are vast. They can be used for diagnosis and clinical care, patient-guided use, clerical and administrative tasks, medical and nursing education, and scientific research and drug development. However, there are also risks associated with the use of LMMs. They can produce false, inaccurate, biased, or incomplete statements. These could harm individuals relying on this information for their health decisions. LMMs may also be trained on poor quality or biased data, leading to potential disparities in healthcare outcomes.
The guidance also highlights broader risks to health systems, such as the accessibility and affordability of the best-performing LMMs. There is a concern that healthcare professionals and patients may develop “automation bias,” relying too heavily on LMMs and overlooking errors or improperly delegating difficult choices to these technologies. Additionally, LMMs are vulnerable to cybersecurity risks, which could compromise patient information and the trustworthiness of these algorithms.
Ensuring a multi-stakeholder framework of AI
To ensure the safe and effective use of LMMs, the WHO emphasizes the need for engagement from various stakeholders, including governments, technology companies, healthcare providers, patients, and civil society. Governments have a primary responsibility to set standards for the development and deployment of LMMs, including their oversight and regulation. The guidance recommends that governments invest in public infrastructure and provide access to computing power and public data sets while adhering to ethical principles and values. WHO’s Guidance of Ethics and Governance AI Usage can be considered as an important framework of universal applicability.
Conclusion
Developers of LMMs should involve potential users and stakeholders, including medical providers, researchers, healthcare professionals, and patients, in the design process. LMMs should be designed to perform well-defined tasks with accuracy and reliability, improving the capacity of health systems.
đź’ˇ *What does the FDA’s latest approval mean for patients with advanced breast cancer?*
Datopotamab deruxtecan (Datroway) has just been approved for treating unresectable or metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, offering new hope for patients who have already undergone multiple therapies. This breakthrough, stemming from the TROPION-Breast01 trial, showcases significant improvements in progression-free survival rates—a vital advancement in cancer care.
Curious about the implications of this treatment for both healthcare providers and patients? Dive into the full article to learn more!
🔍 Are surrogate endpoints the key to shaping the future of health technology assessment?
A new report led by NICE reveals standardized guidance for using surrogate endpoints in health economic models, providing clarity and validation tools for HTA decisions. This collaborative effort across multiple global agencies aims to enhance predictions of long-term health benefits from short-term data.
Jump into the article to explore these impactful insights and learn how this guidance is set to improve health technology evaluations!
🌍 Did you know South African women living with HIV face a significantly higher risk of cervical cancer?
Our latest article looks into the perspectives of women and their partners regarding innovative cervical cancer prevention strategies, including the acceptability of the intravaginal 5-fluorouracil (5FU) treatment. It highlights the critical role of education and counseling in improving screening uptake and treatment adherence.
Explore how we can enhance cervical health for vulnerable populations!
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.