The World Health Organization (WHO) has released new guidance on the ethics and governance of large multi-modal models (LMMs), which are generative AI technologies that have the potential to improve healthcare outcomes. The guidance includes over 40 recommendations for governments, technology companies, and healthcare providers to ensure the appropriate use of LMMs. LMMs are unique in their ability to accept various types of data inputs, such as text, videos, and images, and generate diverse outputs. They mimic human communication and can perform tasks that they were not explicitly programmed to do. These technologies have been adopted at an unprecedented rate, with platforms like ChatGPT, Bard, and Bert gaining popularity in 2023. This article will discuss WHO’s Guidance of Ethics and Governance AI Usage.
Guiding AI’s Role in Healthcare
The potential benefits of LMMs in healthcare are vast. They can be used for diagnosis and clinical care, patient-guided use, clerical and administrative tasks, medical and nursing education, and scientific research and drug development. However, there are also risks associated with the use of LMMs. They can produce false, inaccurate, biased, or incomplete statements. These could harm individuals relying on this information for their health decisions. LMMs may also be trained on poor quality or biased data, leading to potential disparities in healthcare outcomes.
Figure 1: WHO Guidance on Ethics and Governance on AI for Health
The guidance also highlights broader risks to health systems, such as the accessibility and affordability of the best-performing LMMs. There is a concern that healthcare professionals and patients may develop “automation bias,” relying too heavily on LMMs and overlooking errors or improperly delegating difficult choices to these technologies. Additionally, LMMs are vulnerable to cybersecurity risks, which could compromise patient information and the trustworthiness of these algorithms.
Ensuring a multi-stakeholder framework of AI
To ensure the safe and effective use of LMMs, the WHO emphasizes the need for engagement from various stakeholders, including governments, technology companies, healthcare providers, patients, and civil society. Governments have a primary responsibility to set standards for the development and deployment of LMMs, including their oversight and regulation. The guidance recommends that governments invest in public infrastructure and provide access to computing power and public data sets while adhering to ethical principles and values. WHO’s Guidance of Ethics and Governance AI Usage can be considered as an important framework of universal applicability.
Conclusion
Developers of LMMs should involve potential users and stakeholders, including medical providers, researchers, healthcare professionals, and patients, in the design process. LMMs should be designed to perform well-defined tasks with accuracy and reliability, improving the capacity of health systems.
🌍 Will Yeztugo Approval and Access Strategy Deliver an Inflection Point in HIV/AIDS?
Yeztugo (lenacapavir), a twice-yearly injection, redefines long-acting HIV prevention with 96–100% efficacy. Gilead’s access strategy—insurance, assistance, and generics for 120 countries—targets global impact. Can it balance $28,218 U.S. costs with equity for 1.3M annual infections? My article explores health economics, public health, and market dynamics.
📖 Read how Yeztugo’s access strategy could transform long-acting HIV prevention
💊 Are you curious about how Canada plans to make essential prescription drugs accessible for everyone?
Canada’s Drug Agency has launched a national consultation to create a list of essential prescriptions that aim to ensure equitable access, improve health outcomes, and reduce costs. This initiative marks a key step towards universal pharmacare and highlights the importance of evidence-based practices in healthcare.
Dive into our latest article to learn more about the implications for patients, policymakers, and the broader healthcare system!
The recent overhaul of the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) raises critical concerns about the integrity and transparency in vaccine recommendations. The abrupt removal of longstanding members may disrupt the essential processes that have historically upheld public trust and immunization success.
Curious about the implications for health policy and public health? Dive into the full analysis to understand the balance needed between continuity and reform!
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.
