WHO’s Guidance of Ethics and Governance AI Usage

By Sumona Bose

January 30, 2024

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) has released new guidance on the ethics and governance of large multi-modal models (LMMs), which are generative AI technologies that have the potential to improve healthcare outcomes. The guidance includes over 40 recommendations for governments, technology companies, and healthcare providers to ensure the appropriate use of LMMs. LMMs are unique in their ability to accept various types of data inputs, such as text, videos, and images, and generate diverse outputs. They mimic human communication and can perform tasks that they were not explicitly programmed to do. These technologies have been adopted at an unprecedented rate, with platforms like ChatGPT, Bard, and Bert gaining popularity in 2023. This article will discuss WHO’s Guidance of Ethics and Governance AI Usage.

Guiding AI’s Role in Healthcare

The potential benefits of LMMs in healthcare are vast. They can be used for diagnosis and clinical care, patient-guided use, clerical and administrative tasks, medical and nursing education, and scientific research and drug development. However, there are also risks associated with the use of LMMs. They can produce false, inaccurate, biased, or incomplete statements. These could harm individuals relying on this information for their health decisions. LMMs may also be trained on poor quality or biased data, leading to potential disparities in healthcare outcomes.

WHO - Ethics And Governance of Artificial Intelligence - DigitalRosh
Figure 1: WHO Guidance on Ethics and Governance on AI for Health

The guidance also highlights broader risks to health systems, such as the accessibility and affordability of the best-performing LMMs. There is a concern that healthcare professionals and patients may develop “automation bias,” relying too heavily on LMMs and overlooking errors or improperly delegating difficult choices to these technologies. Additionally, LMMs are vulnerable to cybersecurity risks, which could compromise patient information and the trustworthiness of these algorithms.

Ensuring a multi-stakeholder framework of AI

To ensure the safe and effective use of LMMs, the WHO emphasizes the need for engagement from various stakeholders, including governments, technology companies, healthcare providers, patients, and civil society. Governments have a primary responsibility to set standards for the development and deployment of LMMs, including their oversight and regulation. The guidance recommends that governments invest in public infrastructure and provide access to computing power and public data sets while adhering to ethical principles and values. WHO’s Guidance of Ethics and Governance AI Usage can be considered as an important framework of universal applicability.

Conclusion

Developers of LMMs should involve potential users and stakeholders, including medical providers, researchers, healthcare professionals, and patients, in the design process. LMMs should be designed to perform well-defined tasks with accuracy and reliability, improving the capacity of health systems.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Shingles vaccine affordability
Shingles Vaccine Affordability and Its Impact on Public Health in South Africa

By João L. Carapinha

July 2, 2026

Shingles vaccine affordability remains a pressing concern as the recombinant zoster vaccine launches in South Africa. This vaccine delivers substantially higher efficacy and longer protection against herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia than the live attenuated version withdrawn in 2024, yet...
health innovation access
Widespread Barriers to Health Innovation Access in Portugal

By João L. Carapinha

July 2, 2026

Health innovation access in Portugal is widely viewed as inadequate, with 80% of patient associations rating it as reasonable or poor. Only 14% say most relevant innovations reach patients without significant restrictions, according to a Medjournal.pt investigation. The gaps are most acute in ...
Retracted Trial Publication
Retracted Trial Publication Undermines Support for Avacopan in AAV Treatment

By João L. Carapinha

July 1, 2026

The Retracted Trial Publication of the ADVOCATE study has eliminated the central evidence that supported approval of Tavneos (avacopan) for severe active anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). At the request of two lead academic authors, the