U.S. Withdraws from WHO: Impact on Global Health Security and Relations

By João L. Carapinha

January 21, 2025

U.S. withdraws from WHO

President Trump has signed an executive order to begin the U.S. withdraws from WHO. The order cites the organization’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also highlights the WHO’s failure to implement necessary reforms and its lack of independence from political influence. Additionally, the order addresses the disproportionate financial contributions required from the U.S. compared to other countries. This move involves stopping U.S. funding and personnel support for the WHO. It also seeks alternative international partners.

The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO is driven by criticisms of its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and other global health crises. The WHO faces accusations of failing to implement urgent reforms. It is also criticized for being unduly influenced by member states’ politics. The executive order emphasizes disparities in financial contributions. The U.S. contributes significantly more than countries like China, despite China’s larger population. The order revokes previous notifications and orders concerning U.S. involvement with the WHO. It directs government departments to stop funding and recall personnel while seeking new partners.

Background

The U.S. withdraws from WHO is not unprecedented. It was first initiated in 2020 but later retracted. The WHO has faced harsh criticism for its response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a major global health crisis. Health experts warn that this withdrawal could weaken global defenses against infectious diseases and pandemics. It may undo decades of progress in fighting diseases like AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis.

The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO may compromise global health security. It could diminish U.S. influence and financial support essential for international health initiatives and pandemic preparedness. Stopping U.S. funding could severely affect the WHO’s ability to run global health programs. This might result in gaps in health services and research. The U.S. will need to forge new partnerships to continue supporting global health initiatives. This transition could create instability in global health governance. The withdrawal might also disrupt collaborative research efforts and the sharing of health data, which are critical for developing effective health policies.

Overall, the implications of the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO are extensive. They may have significant consequences for global health security, research, and outcomes.

Reference url

Recent Posts

pharmaceutical access initiative
Pharmaceutical Access Initiative Promotes Unified Health Systems in Europe

By João L. Carapinha

June 12, 2026

The pharmaceutical access initiative led by the Beneluxa countries urges EU and EEA Member States to pursue closer coordination on medicine affordability and supply security. By combining forces, nations can protect universal health systems that treat healthcare as a social right while still enco...
health economic security
Health Economic Security as a Pillar for Growth in Central and Eastern Europe

By HEOR Staff Writer

June 12, 2026

Central and Eastern European nations face intensifying demographic pressures, including rapid population aging, shrinking workforces, and heightened security risks that endanger long-term prosperity. In a recent EFPIA statement, health economic security is seen as essential, as targeted healthcar...
gene therapy reimbursement
Gene Therapy Reimbursement Strategies for Vision Restoration

By HEOR Staff Writer

June 12, 2026

Gene therapy reimbursement in the Netherlands has demonstrated clear clinical value since the 2021 conditional access agreement for voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna®). Five years of structured real-world use confirmed that carefully designed protocols successfully selected appropriate patients wit...