U.S. Withdraws from WHO: Impact on Global Health Security and Relations

By João L. Carapinha

January 21, 2025

President Trump has signed an executive order to begin the U.S. withdraws from WHO. The order cites the organization’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also highlights the WHO’s failure to implement necessary reforms and its lack of independence from political influence. Additionally, the order addresses the disproportionate financial contributions required from the U.S. compared to other countries. This move involves stopping U.S. funding and personnel support for the WHO. It also seeks alternative international partners.

The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO is driven by criticisms of its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and other global health crises. The WHO faces accusations of failing to implement urgent reforms. It is also criticized for being unduly influenced by member states’ politics. The executive order emphasizes disparities in financial contributions. The U.S. contributes significantly more than countries like China, despite China’s larger population. The order revokes previous notifications and orders concerning U.S. involvement with the WHO. It directs government departments to stop funding and recall personnel while seeking new partners.

Background

The U.S. withdraws from WHO is not unprecedented. It was first initiated in 2020 but later retracted. The WHO has faced harsh criticism for its response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a major global health crisis. Health experts warn that this withdrawal could weaken global defenses against infectious diseases and pandemics. It may undo decades of progress in fighting diseases like AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis.

The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO may compromise global health security. It could diminish U.S. influence and financial support essential for international health initiatives and pandemic preparedness. Stopping U.S. funding could severely affect the WHO’s ability to run global health programs. This might result in gaps in health services and research. The U.S. will need to forge new partnerships to continue supporting global health initiatives. This transition could create instability in global health governance. The withdrawal might also disrupt collaborative research efforts and the sharing of health data, which are critical for developing effective health policies.

Overall, the implications of the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO are extensive. They may have significant consequences for global health security, research, and outcomes.

Reference url

Recent Posts

HIV prevention injection
   

FDA Approval and Access Strategy for Lenacapavir (Yeztugo) Long-Acting HIV Prevention

🌍 Will Yeztugo Approval and Access Strategy Deliver an Inflection Point in HIV/AIDS?

Yeztugo (lenacapavir), a twice-yearly injection, redefines long-acting HIV prevention with 96–100% efficacy. Gilead’s access strategy—insurance, assistance, and generics for 120 countries—targets global impact. Can it balance $28,218 U.S. costs with equity for 1.3M annual infections? My article explores health economics, public health, and market dynamics.

📖 Read how Yeztugo’s access strategy could transform long-acting HIV prevention

#SyenzaNews #GlobalHealth #HIVPrevention #Yeztugo #PrEP

essential prescription drugs
       

Canada Launches Consultation for Essential Prescription Drugs List

💊 Are you curious about how Canada plans to make essential prescription drugs accessible for everyone?

Canada’s Drug Agency has launched a national consultation to create a list of essential prescriptions that aim to ensure equitable access, improve health outcomes, and reduce costs. This initiative marks a key step towards universal pharmacare and highlights the importance of evidence-based practices in healthcare.

Dive into our latest article to learn more about the implications for patients, policymakers, and the broader healthcare system!

#SyenzaNews #healthcare #HealthEconomics

ACIP vaccine policy concerns
     

ACIP Vaccine Policy Concerns

🛑 Is the future of vaccine policy at risk?

The recent overhaul of the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) raises critical concerns about the integrity and transparency in vaccine recommendations. The abrupt removal of longstanding members may disrupt the essential processes that have historically upheld public trust and immunization success.

Curious about the implications for health policy and public health? Dive into the full analysis to understand the balance needed between continuity and reform!

#SyenzaNews #HealthcarePolicy #HealthEconomics #Innovation

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.