U.S. Withdraws from WHO: Impact on Global Health Security and Relations

By João L. Carapinha

January 21, 2025

President Trump has signed an executive order to begin the U.S. withdraws from WHO. The order cites the organization’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also highlights the WHO’s failure to implement necessary reforms and its lack of independence from political influence. Additionally, the order addresses the disproportionate financial contributions required from the U.S. compared to other countries. This move involves stopping U.S. funding and personnel support for the WHO. It also seeks alternative international partners.

The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO is driven by criticisms of its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and other global health crises. The WHO faces accusations of failing to implement urgent reforms. It is also criticized for being unduly influenced by member states’ politics. The executive order emphasizes disparities in financial contributions. The U.S. contributes significantly more than countries like China, despite China’s larger population. The order revokes previous notifications and orders concerning U.S. involvement with the WHO. It directs government departments to stop funding and recall personnel while seeking new partners.

Background

The U.S. withdraws from WHO is not unprecedented. It was first initiated in 2020 but later retracted. The WHO has faced harsh criticism for its response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a major global health crisis. Health experts warn that this withdrawal could weaken global defenses against infectious diseases and pandemics. It may undo decades of progress in fighting diseases like AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis.

The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO may compromise global health security. It could diminish U.S. influence and financial support essential for international health initiatives and pandemic preparedness. Stopping U.S. funding could severely affect the WHO’s ability to run global health programs. This might result in gaps in health services and research. The U.S. will need to forge new partnerships to continue supporting global health initiatives. This transition could create instability in global health governance. The withdrawal might also disrupt collaborative research efforts and the sharing of health data, which are critical for developing effective health policies.

Overall, the implications of the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO are extensive. They may have significant consequences for global health security, research, and outcomes.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Provisional Agreement on EU Pharmaceutical Reform: Boosting Innovation and Combatting Antimicrobi...

By João L. Carapinha

December 12, 2025

Provisional Deal Ushers in EU Pharmaceutical Reform The European Parliament and Council have reached a provisional agreement to overhaul the EU's pharmaceutical policy framework, marking a major step in the EU Pharmaceutical Refor...
2025 China Drug Catalog Boosts Access with 114 New Drugs and Innovative Solutions

By HEOR Staff Writer

December 9, 2025

Expansion of Coverage in the 2025 National Basic Medical Insurance Drug Catalog In this update we highlight updates and implications of the 2025 National Basic Medical Insurance Drug Catalog in China's ...
NICE Approves Seven Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation Technologies for Enhanced Patient Care

By HEOR Staff Writer

December 8, 2025

Digital cardiac rehabilitation is transforming how patients with cardiovascular disease access vital recovery support, and if you're wondering about the latest NICE recommendations for digital platforms in cardiac rehab, here's the key update. NICE has conditionally approved seven innovative tool...