The Market Dynamics of Track One Patent Strategy in Pharmaceuticals

By Rene Pretorius

September 26, 2025

In the interconnected landscape of pharmaceutical regulation and innovation, the Track One patent strategy in pharmaceuticals serves as an important component that influences the timing of market entry for generic and biosimilar products. This analysis employs a business dynamics approach to explore how the USPTO’s Track One prioritized examination program interacts with patent strategies and regulatory exclusivities. By examining feedback loops among patent grants, FDA approvals, and competitive dynamics, we draw on data from Track One patents issued between 2011 and 2022 to illustrate these relationships.

Key Insights from a Business Dynamics View

From a business dynamics perspective, the Track One patent strategy in pharmaceuticals involves coordinated timing where manufacturers utilize expedited review to align patent grants with the expiration of FDA statutory exclusivities. Data indicate that Track One patents accounted for 27% of all patents on small-molecule drugs and 51% on biologics, with 86% and 90% being continuation patents, respectively. These continuations typically build on prior disclosures without introducing new inventions. Timing patterns show peaks in Track One patents occurring later for products with extended exclusivities—years 3 and 4 for small-molecule drugs with 5- and 7-year periods, and year 13 for biologics, coinciding with the end of their 12-year exclusivity.

This integration forms interconnected loops: Expedited continuations contribute to comprehensive patent portfolios, which can introduce variability in the patent landscape visible to potential competitors only upon grant. For biologics, where patent disclosure requirements differ from small-molecule drugs, the Track One patent strategy in pharmaceuticals may extend the period needed for biosimilar developers to evaluate and prepare, as additional studies could be required.

Background Context in the Broader System

Introduced by the USPTO in 2011, the Track One program offers review within 12 months for a fee, designed to support timely patent protection. Within the larger system, it interfaces with FDA exclusivities (ranging from 3 to 7 years for small-molecules and 12 years for biologics) and the increasing use of continuation applications. These elements collectively shape how manufacturers strategically position patents to optimize portfolio development. In 2025, the USPTO further expanded the program by increasing the annual limit on requests to 20,000 and discontinuing the separate Accelerated Examination program in favor of Track One. This adjustment aims to accommodate growing demand while streamlining expedited options.

Implications and Systemic Outcomes

The Track One patent strategy in pharmaceuticals influences broader system dynamics by affecting the predictability of competitive entry, which in turn impacts market pricing and access timelines. Evidence suggests that such timing can extend the effective period of market exclusivity, as competitors navigate evolving patent information. In economic terms, this may alter the pace at which price reductions occur through generic or biosimilar competition, typically leading to savings of 80-90%. From a business dynamics standpoint, these interactions highlight opportunities for adjustments, such as confining Track One to original patents, to balance innovation incentives with competitive efficiency.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Enhancing Safety and Performance: The Role of EU Medical Device Panels

By João L. Carapinha

February 19, 2026

EU Medical Device Panels: Enhancing Safety and Performance Evaluations EU Medical Device Panels established by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) provide specialized expertise on clinical and performance evaluat...
Exploring MFN Policy Effectiveness in Drug Pricing and Innovation
MFN Policy Effectiveness in Countering Freeloading Claims The MFN policy effectiveness is evident in the coalition letter dated February 12, 2026, which opposes codifying Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) prescription drug pricing b...
Zorginstituut Nederland’s Lecanemab Health Insurance Rejection: Implications for Alzheimer&...

By HEOR Staff Writer

February 18, 2026

Dutch Health Insurance Rejects Lecanemab Coverage Zorginstituut Nederland's advisory letter dated 13 February 2026 recommends against including lecanemab (Leqembi®) in the Dutch basic health insurance package, marking a key lecanema...