The Socioeconomic Impact of Cervical Cancer in the UK

By Staff Writer

March 7, 2024

Introduction

The socioeconomic impact of cervical cancer in the UK is a significant concern and the fourth most common cancer type globally among women. This article, based on a report from the Office of Health Economics (OHE), quantifies that burden and the potential savings from reaching the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) elimination target set in 2020. Currently the disease burden in the UK is more than twice the WHO target of less than 4 cases per 100,000 women.

The Cost of Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer carries an estimated lifetime cost of £208,086 per case in the UK. This value includes direct healthcare expenses, individual patient costs, and broader societal costs (Figure 3) due to morbidity and mortality. The strain primarily falls on society and families, accounting for 85% of the total burden, with the healthcare system bearing just 8%. The primary factor influencing the overall cost throughout an individual person’s lifetime is the reduction in productivity (Figure 1), amounting to £130,984. This accounts for 63% of the individual burden and is mostly caused by the economic impact of mortality due to cervical cancer.

Figure 1. Lifetime socioeconomic cost per newly diagnosed patient

OOP= Out of pocket

The Socioeconomic Impact of Cervical Cancer in the UK

The total socioeconomic burden of new cervical cancer cases in the UK, at the current incidence rate of 9.7 cases per 100,000, is approximately £691 million. To put this into perspective, this burden equates to about 40% of the UK’s combined spending on immunisation and early detection programmes pre-COVID-19 (£1.7 billion in 2019) or about 8% of the total UK pre-COVID-19 spending on preventative care (£8.3 billion in 2019).

The Potential Savings

If the WHO elimination target were achieved today, there would be an instant 59% reduction in the socioeconomic burden, equivalent to about £406 million. The UK could save around £2.6 billion (Figure 2) compared to taking no action on cervical cancer elimination by achieving the WHO elimination threshold by 2046. This means that the socioeconomic burden of cervical cancer is preventable. However, these savings do not consider the cost required to achieve elimination, such as spending on prevention and control measures like vaccination and screening.

Figure 2. Achieving the WHO elimination target in the UK by 2046 could save £2.6 billion

The Path to Elimination

Achieving elimination requires a comprehensive action plan from the National Health Service (NHS) to overcome barriers to access, education, and awareness while maintaining adequate funding and resources. NHS England’s recent commitment to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040 provides the impetus to improve vaccination and screening coverage and implement a clear strategy to accelerate elimination.

Figure 3. Framework of cervical cancer socioeconomic burden

* Productivity loss quantifications already include tax returns due to workplace absenteeism.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the socioeconomic burden of cervical cancer in the UK, emphasises the urgency for effective intervention strategies to achieve the WHO elimination target by 2046, compared to taking no action. However, these savings must be weighed against the costs of implementing such strategies, including vaccination and screening programs. Therefore, it is crucial for health economists and policymakers to conduct further cost-effectiveness analyses to determine the optimal allocation of resources.

Reference url

Recent Posts

MPA meningioma risk
       

MPA Meningioma Risk: Key Insights and Implications

⚠️ *Are you aware of the new safety warnings surrounding medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)?*
The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) has clarified crucial information regarding the potential **MPA meningioma risk** associated with prolonged use of this synthetic hormone. While the absolute risk remains low, the implications for patients and healthcare providers are significant.

Dive into the article to understand the updated guidelines and what they mean for clinical practice.

#SyenzaNews #healthcare #oncology #HealthEconomics

MENA generics biologics growth
        

MENA Generics Biologics Healthcare Innovation

💡 *What does the future hold for healthcare in the MENA region?*
The rise of generics and biologics is set to transform healthcare in the Middle East and North Africa, driven by government reforms and an evolving regulatory landscape. Learn how these advancements are making life-saving therapies more accessible and cost-effective for patients across the region.

#SyenzaNews #HealthcareInnovation #pharmaceuticals #MarketAccess

Trump healthcare policy changes
    

Trump Healthcare Policy Changes: Reversing Biden’s Executive Orders and WHO Withdrawal

🚨 *What does Trump’s latest healthcare policy shift mean for the future of U.S. health initiatives?*
In a bold move, President Trump has reversed key Biden-era healthcare directives, altering approaches to COVID-19, drug pricing, and international health partnerships. This could reshape our healthcare landscape significantly. Dive into the article to understand how these changes could impact patients, providers, and the industry at large!

#SyenzaNews #healthcare #healthcarepolicy #innovation

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.