Revolutionising Oncology Medicine: A Precision Approach that Cuts Costs and Boosts ROI

By HEOR Staff Writer

July 11, 2023

In a groundbreaking study published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice volume, an analysis was conducted on the R&D costs of oncology medicines. The analysis, based on data from company filings from 1997 to 2020, indicates that a precision approach to oncology medicine development using Companion Diagnostic (CDx) could significantly reduce costs and increase ROI.

Despite some missing data, primarily from larger pharmaceutical companies that have acquired smaller firms, the study still provides a robust picture of the R&D landscape. They found that the total R&D spend to develop an oncology medicine (inconsistent use of CDx) is $4432.1 m, a figure that is significantly reduced when a CDx-guided precision oncology approach is adopted.

While the World Health Organization (WHO) has called for more transparency in R&D costs, this study highlights the need for standardisation in reporting R&D spend. This is crucial for health systems to make well-informed decisions on healthcare policy and for the pharmaceutical industry to recover R&D costs and continue innovating.

Findings suggest that precision oncology medicines guided by CDx are not only less expensive to develop but also offer better value to stakeholders, including patients, payers, and the pharmaceutical industry. This approach not only reduces R&D spend but also accelerates the reimbursement process and requires a rethinking of market access strategies.

The implications are far-reaching, impacting drug discovery, market access, health outcomes, and industry policy. As the pharmaceutical industry realises the cost-effectiveness of precision oncology medicines, it presents challenges to ensure equitable treatment provision for all patients.

This study emphasises the need for a flexible CDx development framework to truly benefit patients and ensure that R&D spend in oncology medicine development is affordable to health systems. The industry should revisit the commercial model for precision medicines and their associated diagnostic/prognostic tests to capitalise on the benefits of precision medicine.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Administrative Court Error Complicates Infarmed Vaccine Data Transparency

By João L. Carapinha

February 23, 2026

Court Clerical Error Threatens Infarmed Vaccine Data Transparency Infarmed vaccine data transparency hangs in the balance due to a clerical error by the Lisbon Administrative Court's secretariat, which sent a January...
Exploring MFN Policy Effectiveness in Drug Pricing and Innovation

By João L. Carapinha

February 19, 2026

MFN Policy Effectiveness in Countering Freeloading Claims The MFN policy effectiveness is evident in the coalition letter dated February 12, 2026, which opposes codifying Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) prescription drug pricing b...
Zorginstituut Nederland’s Lecanemab Health Insurance Rejection: Implications for Alzheimer&...

By HEOR Staff Writer

February 18, 2026

Dutch Health Insurance Rejects Lecanemab Coverage Zorginstituut Nederland's advisory letter dated 13 February 2026 recommends against including lecanemab (Leqembi®) in the Dutch basic health insurance package, marking a key lecanema...