Reevaluating NICE’s Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: The QALY Debate

By João L. Carapinha

December 17, 2024

NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) recently commented on whether their cost-effectiveness thresholds should change, focusing on the intricate relationship between quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The ongoing debate about NICE’s cost-effectiveness thresholds reveals important concerns and insights relevant to healthcare technology assessment.

Ongoing Debate on QALYs

The use of QALYs in cost-effectiveness analysis remains a contentious issue. Critics argue that QALYs may not adequately capture the complexity of health outcomes and can be discriminatory, especially against specific patient groups. In NICE’s context, the debate centers on whether QALYs should be adjusted to reflect continuous economic growth and willingness to pay for innovation. Despite these discussions, QALYs continue to be a prevalent metric in the UK for evaluating health interventions.

Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds

Historically, NICE has employed a cost-effectiveness threshold range of £20,000 to £30,000 per QALY gained. This threshold is essential for determining whether new healthcare technologies offer good value for money. However, the NICE blog post argues that merely increasing the cost per QALY may not remedy access issues to innovative healthcare technologies. Rather, we highlight the need for the ICER to accurately reflect the country’s growing economic development and societal willingness to pay for innovation.

Economic Development and Willingness to Pay

The UK’s cost-effectiveness threshold has remained relatively static, which may signal a lag in the country’s willingness to invest in innovative healthcare technologies, compared to its international peers. It is crucial for these thresholds to adapt alongside economic shifts and changing societal values to maintain their relevance and effectiveness.

Positive Recommendations and Fixed Thresholds

Despite the ongoing debates, NICE has recommended positive outcomes for 86% of applications, demonstrating a generally supportive stance towards new technologies. The cost-effectiveness threshold is set to remain unchanged until 2028, which offers a degree of stability for healthcare providers and manufacturers.

Methodological Elements and Future Contributions

The continuous methodological discussions are significant, particularly regarding the adjustments of thresholds. Contributing to this discussion can enhance the process of determining appropriate cost-effectiveness thresholds. Factors such as uncertainty in the evidence base, disease burden, and alternative treatment availability all play vital roles in informing NICE’s decisions.

In summary, NICE explores the complex and multifaceted discussions surrounding cost-effectiveness thresholds and QALYs. We highlight the need for thresholds to be dynamic and reflective of broader economic and societal changes while also focussing on the importance of methodological rigor in these evaluations. The examination of NICE’s cost-effectiveness thresholds provides essential insights for further engagement in this crucial debate.

Reference url

Recent Posts

DTC telehealth partnerships
           

DTC Telehealth Partnerships: Navigating Risks in Pharma’s Digital Expansion

🚀 Are pharmaceutical companies’ DTC telehealth partnerships reshaping healthcare for better or worse?

Recent findings from the “DTC Investigation 2025” report reveal key insights into the high prescription rates and potential risks of these digital platforms operated by giants like Pfizer and Eli Lilly. Alarmingly, inadequate clinical safeguards raise questions about patient safety, prescribing practices, and cost implications.

Dive into this critical discussion about the intersection of digital health and pharmaceutical practices, and explore what it means for the future of patient care.

#SyenzaNews #DigitalHealth #HealthEconomics #HealthcarePolicy

MAF Test breast cancer
       

MAF Test Breast Cancer: Revolutionizing Personalized Treatment in Spanish Oncology

🌟 How can personalized medicine transform breast cancer treatment in Spain?

The recent rollout of the MAF Test breast cancer in leading Spanish hospitals is set to revolutionize patient care by enabling targeted treatment strategies. This innovative molecular assay not only identifies patients who will benefit from bisphosphonates but also spares those for whom the treatment may be harmful, ultimately improving outcomes for thousands.

Dive into the article to discover how this approach aligns with global trends in oncology and enhances healthcare resource allocation.

#SyenzaNews #precisionmedicine #HealthEconomics #innovation

ribociclib breast cancer guidance
           

NICE’s Ribociclib Breast Cancer Guidance: A New Era for High-Risk Patients in the NHS

🌟 Are we on the brink of transforming breast cancer treatment?

NICE’s latest guidance endorsing ribociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor marks a significant advancement for adults facing high-risk early breast cancer. This decision not only promises enhanced survival outcomes but also expands treatment options for patients historically limited to conventional therapies.

Dive into the details of this important development and learn how it may revolutionize patient care in the oncology landscape.

#SyenzaNews #oncology #costeffectiveness #MarketAccess

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

JOIN NEWSLETTER

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.