Reevaluating NICE’s Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: The QALY Debate

By João L. Carapinha

December 17, 2024

NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) recently commented on whether their cost-effectiveness thresholds should change, focusing on the intricate relationship between quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The ongoing debate about NICE’s cost-effectiveness thresholds reveals important concerns and insights relevant to healthcare technology assessment.

Ongoing Debate on QALYs

The use of QALYs in cost-effectiveness analysis remains a contentious issue. Critics argue that QALYs may not adequately capture the complexity of health outcomes and can be discriminatory, especially against specific patient groups. In NICE’s context, the debate centers on whether QALYs should be adjusted to reflect continuous economic growth and willingness to pay for innovation. Despite these discussions, QALYs continue to be a prevalent metric in the UK for evaluating health interventions.

Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds

Historically, NICE has employed a cost-effectiveness threshold range of £20,000 to £30,000 per QALY gained. This threshold is essential for determining whether new healthcare technologies offer good value for money. However, the NICE blog post argues that merely increasing the cost per QALY may not remedy access issues to innovative healthcare technologies. Rather, we highlight the need for the ICER to accurately reflect the country’s growing economic development and societal willingness to pay for innovation.

Economic Development and Willingness to Pay

The UK’s cost-effectiveness threshold has remained relatively static, which may signal a lag in the country’s willingness to invest in innovative healthcare technologies, compared to its international peers. It is crucial for these thresholds to adapt alongside economic shifts and changing societal values to maintain their relevance and effectiveness.

Positive Recommendations and Fixed Thresholds

Despite the ongoing debates, NICE has recommended positive outcomes for 86% of applications, demonstrating a generally supportive stance towards new technologies. The cost-effectiveness threshold is set to remain unchanged until 2028, which offers a degree of stability for healthcare providers and manufacturers.

Methodological Elements and Future Contributions

The continuous methodological discussions are significant, particularly regarding the adjustments of thresholds. Contributing to this discussion can enhance the process of determining appropriate cost-effectiveness thresholds. Factors such as uncertainty in the evidence base, disease burden, and alternative treatment availability all play vital roles in informing NICE’s decisions.

In summary, NICE explores the complex and multifaceted discussions surrounding cost-effectiveness thresholds and QALYs. We highlight the need for thresholds to be dynamic and reflective of broader economic and societal changes while also focussing on the importance of methodological rigor in these evaluations. The examination of NICE’s cost-effectiveness thresholds provides essential insights for further engagement in this crucial debate.

Reference url

Recent Posts

prior authorization elimination
   

Prior Authorization Elimination: Is Optum Rx moving towards Access Efficiency?

🚀 Are prior authorizations holding back patient access to crucial medications?

Optum Rx is set to eliminate prior authorizations for about 80 drugs starting May 1, 2025, streamlining access to treatments for chronic conditions like cystic fibrosis and asthma. This significant move is aimed at reducing unnecessary administrative burdens, ultimately enhancing patient care.

Curious about the implications for the healthcare system and potential cost savings? Dive into the full article for an in-depth look!

#SyenzaNews #healthcare #HealthEconomics

South Africa cannabis regulations
     

South Africa Cannabis Regulations: Government Withdraws Ban for New Framework Development

🌿 Curious about the future of cannabis in South Africa?

Recent developments have seen the government retract its ban on hemp and cannabis food products, signaling a major shift towards a more responsible regulatory framework. With a focus on stakeholder consultation, this move aims to foster industry growth while prioritizing public health.

Explore how these changes are set to reshape the landscape of the cannabis industry in South Africa and beyond!

#SyenzaNews #HealthEconomics #MarketAccess

lumped parameter model
      

Advancing Heart Transplantation: The Role of the Lumped Parameter Model

🫀 How can a new model improve heart transplantation?

A recent study introduces a **lumped parameter model (LPM)** designed to enhance the evaluation of donor heart function during ex vivo perfusion, aiming to boost donor heart utilization and reduce primary graft dysfunction rates. This innovative approach holds promise for improving clinical decision-making and outcomes in heart transplantation.

Dive into the article for insightful details on how LPMs could reshape the future of cardiac care!

#SyenzaNews #HealthcareInnovation #HealthEconomics #Innovation

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.