Publication Delays Impact Careers of Early-Career Researchers

By João L. Carapinha

May 19, 2025

The article “Dear editors, your publication delays are damaging our careers” by Chia-Hsuan Hsu highlights how publication delays hurt careers, especially for early-career researchers. With publication records key for jobs and tenure, slow editorial processes stall academic progress. The author shares waiting 18 months for a decision, blaming poor reviewer recruitment. This calls on editors to improve efficiency.

The Detrimental Impact of Delays

The article notes that publication delays impact careers by harming early-career researchers. Delays can cost job and funding chances, hindering growth. East Asia heavily weighs publication history in evaluations, making delays more damaging than in regions valuing broader contributions. Bottlenecks often stem from poor reviewer recruitment and communication, not scientific merit. While preprints speed up sharing findings, they often don’t count for career evaluations in Japan and Taiwan.

The article reflects broader issues in publishing and evaluation. The global academic system overvalues publications for hiring and funding, pressuring early-career researchers into a publish or perish culture. A few big publishers control the market while unpaid editorial labor leads to slow, profit-driven processes that clash with researchers’ needs. Delays often arise from reviewer shortages and overworked editors, hurting researchers needing timely output.

Proactive Solutions for a Changing Landscape

  • Reforming Academic Evaluation: Reports suggest valuing preprints and datasets more, but until reforms spread, early-career researchers suffer.
  • Innovative Peer Review Models: Open peer review and reviewer incentives could help, needing publisher and institutional cooperation.
  • Policy Recommendations: Health agencies and consortia could recognize preprints in evaluations, easing delays’ harm.

In summary, the article shows how publication delays hurt careers. Fixing this needs changes from editors, publishers, and institutions to ensure fair opportunities. For deeper insights, explore the source material.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Glofitamab Cost-Effectiveness: Conditional Reimbursement Insights for DLBCL Treatment

By HEOR Staff Writer

February 17, 2026

Glofitamab Cost-Effectiveness in R/R DLBCL Reimbursement Glofitamab cost-effectiveness analysis by Zorginstituut Nederland supports conditional inclusion of glofitamab (Columvi®) with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Glofit-GemOx)...
NICE Endorses Pegzilarginase for Treating Arginase Deficiency
NICE Backs Pegzilarginase for Arginase Deficiency The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) final draft guidance recommends pegzilarginase arginase deficiency treatment (Loargys, Immedica) as an option for people ...
Transformative PBM Reform Legislation Signed into Law

By João L. Carapinha

February 16, 2026

PBM Reform Legislation Signed into Law President Trump signed a comprehensive spending bill incorporating landmark PBM reform legislation, ending a partial government shutdown while targeting pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with transformativ...