Publication Delays Impact Careers of Early-Career Researchers

By João L. Carapinha

May 19, 2025

The article “Dear editors, your publication delays are damaging our careers” by Chia-Hsuan Hsu highlights how publication delays hurt careers, especially for early-career researchers. With publication records key for jobs and tenure, slow editorial processes stall academic progress. The author shares waiting 18 months for a decision, blaming poor reviewer recruitment. This calls on editors to improve efficiency.

The Detrimental Impact of Delays

The article notes that publication delays impact careers by harming early-career researchers. Delays can cost job and funding chances, hindering growth. East Asia heavily weighs publication history in evaluations, making delays more damaging than in regions valuing broader contributions. Bottlenecks often stem from poor reviewer recruitment and communication, not scientific merit. While preprints speed up sharing findings, they often don’t count for career evaluations in Japan and Taiwan.

The article reflects broader issues in publishing and evaluation. The global academic system overvalues publications for hiring and funding, pressuring early-career researchers into a publish or perish culture. A few big publishers control the market while unpaid editorial labor leads to slow, profit-driven processes that clash with researchers’ needs. Delays often arise from reviewer shortages and overworked editors, hurting researchers needing timely output.

Proactive Solutions for a Changing Landscape

  • Reforming Academic Evaluation: Reports suggest valuing preprints and datasets more, but until reforms spread, early-career researchers suffer.
  • Innovative Peer Review Models: Open peer review and reviewer incentives could help, needing publisher and institutional cooperation.
  • Policy Recommendations: Health agencies and consortia could recognize preprints in evaluations, easing delays’ harm.

In summary, the article shows how publication delays hurt careers. Fixing this needs changes from editors, publishers, and institutions to ensure fair opportunities. For deeper insights, explore the source material.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Risicoverevening Policy Updates: Key Amendments for 2022-2025 Explained

By HEOR Staff Writer

January 27, 2026

On December 9, 2025, the Board of Directors of Zorginstituut Nederland (decision reference 2025027072) approved amendments to the Beleidsregels risicoverevening for 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025. These changes, published in Staatscourant 2026 nr. 967 on January 19, 2026, correct te...
Characterizing Burnout in Health Professionals: Insights from the BEATS Study in Portugal
Burnout Health Professionals: Join the BEATS Study Call Burnout health professionals in Portugal are invited to participate in the BEATS study, an initiative by the Portuguese Laboratory for Healthy Work Environments. Titled "B...
NICE Endorses Dupilumab for Eosinophilic COPD Treatment

By HEOR Staff Writer

January 26, 2026

NICE Backs Dupilumab Eosinophilic COPD Option Dupilumab eosinophilic COPD treatment gains momentum as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) final draft guidance recommends dupilumab as an add-on maintenance therap...