Prevention Valuation: Fund Health, Not Just Savings

By Rene Pretorius

May 9, 2025

Prevention promises healthier lives, but how should we value it? Prevention valuation is critical for funding in value-based care systems. The proverb “prevention is better than cure” underscores prevention’s edge: stopping diseases cuts suffering and costs versus treating illness. Prevention delivers immediate health gains and long-term savings, yet competes with treatment’s urgent budget and short-term benefit evidence demands. A systems perspective shows short-term cost focus skewing resources toward treatment. Misjudging prevention’s value risks underfunding effective strategies or overinvesting in ineffective ones.

Systemic Barriers to Prevention

Pryor and Volpp (2018) urge a paradigm shift for prevention, citing the Diabetes Prevention Program’s cost-effectiveness and smoking cessation incentives. Adoption lags due to barriers: insurers favor short-term savings amid member turnover; providers prefer prescriptions over behavioral interventions; prevention faces stricter cost-effectiveness scrutiny than treatments (e.g., Medicare hesitates on prevention but covers costly therapies like Avastin). Equal evaluation standards, digital platforms (e.g., online DPP), and payment reforms could scale prevention and align incentives.

Challenging Cost-Saving Myths

Baicker and Chandra (2025) refute the myth that prevention must save money, advocating health-focused valuation, like treatments. Most prevention, except vaccinations, fails to cut costs due to high costs or large numbers needed to treat (NNT). A $400-per-month wellness program with 1% heart failure risk reduction costs $960,000 to avert a $22,000 case (NNT=100). Trials show workplace wellness lacks benefits. Low costs, high averted expenses, and low NNT define cost-saving prevention. Cost-effectiveness should guide funding.

A Unified Valuation Approach

Both perspectives agree: judge prevention like treatments—by health benefits per dollar spent. Pryor et al.’s reforms, like targeting high-risk groups, could lower NNTs, addressing Baicker et al.’s cost-effectiveness concerns. Baicker et al.’s trial-based metrics ensure Pryor et al.’s solutions are evidence-backed. Short-term priorities and cost-saving myths misallocate budgets, favoring cure. Consistent standards and aligned incentives unlock prevention’s potential.

Actionable Steps Forward

Valuing prevention like treatments ensures equitable decisions. Policymakers should mandate uniform cost-effectiveness standards across interventions. Payers must adopt value-based payments to fund proven prevention, like vaccinations or DPP. Evidence generators should conduct rigorous trials to validate health benefits for market access. Health professionals can integrate digital tools, such as online DPP, into workflows to scale delivery, driving sustainable health gains.

Reference url

Recent Posts

US Argentina WHO withdrawal
   

US Argentina WHO Withdrawal: A Shift in Global Health Governance

🚨 Are we on the brink of a major shift in global health governance?

The recent announcement of the US-Argentina withdrawal from the WHO, initiated by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and President Javier Milei, highlights serious concerns over the organization’s management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Both countries are advocating for a new model of health cooperation focused on scientific integrity and accountability.

Curious about what this means for international health policy and future collaborations? Dive into the full analysis for insights and implications.

#SyenzaNews #globalhealth #healthcarepolicy #innovation

EU patent licensing framework
     

EU Patent Licensing Framework: Enhancing Crisis Management in the EU

🌍 Are we ready for the next crisis?

The European Parliament and Council have taken a bold step towards enhancing crisis management with a new EU patent licensing framework. This regulation allows the use of patent rights during emergencies, streamlining processes and bolstering the EU’s preparedness for future challenges.

Curious about how this framework balances innovation and access to essential products? Explore the key insights and implications for industries across Europe in the full article!

#SyenzaNews #HealthcareInnovation #MarketAccess

lung health resolution
 

Aligning Market Access Strategies with the WHO’s Global Lung Health Resolution

🌍 Are your access strategies aligned with the WHO’s Lung Health Resolution?

The World Health Organization’s landmark resolution promotes integrated, equity-driven approaches to lung health—emphasizing prevention, early detection, and access to care. With strong support from the stakeholders, this global initiative sets a new direction for national health priorities.

Why is this relevant for oncology and respiratory access strategies—and what can your team do to stay ahead?

Explore how aligning with this evolving policy landscape can strengthen market access, support reimbursement goals, and drive long-term impact.

#SyenzaNews #globalhealth #healthcarepolicy #WHO #LungHealth

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.