HTA must consider health equity for progress

By HEOR Staff Writer

March 24, 2023

ICER has released a White Paper on Health Equity. This paper measures the impact of health technology assessment (HTA) on equity, and suggests approaches to leverage HTA to advance health equity for racial, ethnic, and socially disadvantaged groups.

When decision-makers evaluate data to inform pricing and insurance coverage, they must consider the implications for health equity. They have taken a close look at every step of our work to assess if we and other HTA groups can make improvements and will enhance the discussion on clinical trial diversity.

It is essential for HTA bodies to be aware of how to add equity into the methods of health technology assessment, and if that can be accomplished by utilizing innovative methods that are expansions of traditional cost-effectiveness analyses, through evidence-grounded deliberative approaches, or a combination of the two.

Reference url

Recent Posts

vulnerable elderly care
Mapping Vulnerable Elderly Care in the Netherlands

By HEOR Staff Writer

June 22, 2026

As the Netherlands confronts rapid societal aging, effective vulnerable elderly care has become an urgent policy priority. One in four community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older lives with vulnerable health, according to Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) data, marking a critical target g...
Joint Scientific Consultation EU
Joint Scientific Consultation EU Strategies for Medical Device Companies

By João L. Carapinha

June 19, 2026

The EU Joint Scientific Consultation gives medical device developers a voluntary route to obtain targeted feedback on clinical evidence plans well before formal Joint Clinical Assessment and national reimbursement decisions. Manufacturers of select high-risk technologies can align their developme...
EU Joint Clinical Assessment
Insights on EU Joint Clinical Assessment for High-Risk Medical Devices

By João L. Carapinha

June 19, 2026

EU Joint Clinical Assessment is a distinct, harmonised process that operates separately from CE marking. It produces comparative clinical evidence on selected high-risk devices to support more consistent national reimbursement decisions across EU member states. Insights from the