Hip Fracture Risk in Elderly Adults: Evaluating Prediction Tools

By Staff Writer

September 25, 2024

Introduction

Hip fractures are a significant concern for adults aged 80 and older, accounting for 70% of such injuries in the US. These fractures lead to severe consequences. Approximately 20% to 30% of fracture patients dying within a year and many survivors experiencing impaired mobility and disability. Given that hip fractures represent 72% of fracture-related healthcare expenditures in the US, identifying individuals at high risk is crucial. Researchers evaluated the effectiveness of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and the Garvan fracture risk calculator in predicting hip fractures in late-life adults. Their study focuses on the performance of these tools in a cohort of 8,890 community-dwelling adults aged 80 and older, followed for five years.

Understanding the Tools: FRAX and Garvan

Although the gradient of risk decreases with age, low bone mineral density (BMD) is a significant predictor of hip fracture. FRAX and Garvan are widely used tools that estimate a patient’s absolute risk of hip fracture. These tools incorporate femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD) and other clinical risk factors. However, their applicability in predicting hip fractures in adults aged 80 and older may be limited. Factors such as competing mortality risk and the prevalence of nonskeletal risk factors like frailty need to be considered.

The study found that both FRAX and Garvan tools incorporating FNBMD had fair to acceptable discrimination for predicting hip fractures over five years. Specifically, the area under the curve (AUC) for FRAX was 0.69 in women and 0.71 in men, while Garvan had an AUC of 0.69 in women and 0.76 in men. These values are lower than those reported for younger populations, indicating that the tools’ discriminative ability decreases with age.

Figure 1. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves for Hip Fracture Prediction in Women and Men

Comparing Tool Performance

In their study, FRAX modestly underestimated hip fracture probability in intermediate-risk individuals, while Garvan markedly overpredicted it in high-risk individuals. The original FRAX derivation study reported a mean AUC of 0.78 for 10-year hip fracture prediction in a population with a mean age of 65 years. In contrast, the study’s AUC for 5-year prediction was lower, reflecting the challenges in predicting fractures in older adults.

Garvan’s performance was also suboptimal in the study. The original derivation study reported an AUC of 0.85 for both sexes in a younger Australian population. However, in the cohort of adults aged 80 and older, Garvan’s AUC was significantly lower. This discrepancy may be due to the model’s assumption that hip fracture hazards rise exponentially with age. However, this may not hold true for the oldest adults.

Clinical Implications

These findings show that FNBMD alone can discriminate hip fracture risk as effectively as the more complex FRAX and Garvan tools in adults aged 80 and older. A previous systematic review found that simple tools with fewer risk factors often match the performance of complex instruments in predicting osteoporotic fractures. In this study, lower FNBMD independently associated with hip fracture risk, even after considering competing mortality risk.

However, increasing age was not as strongly associated with hip fracture risk in late-life adults compared to younger older populations. This finding likely reflects the higher competing mortality risk before hip fracture in late life. Therefore, clinicians should consider hip BMD, life expectancy, and patient preferences when deciding on drug treatment for hip fracture prevention in late-life adults.

Conclusion

In this recent study of community-dwelling US adults aged 80 and older, FNBMD alone predicted 5-year hip fracture risk as well as the more complex FRAX and Garvan tools. FRAX modestly underestimated risk for intermediate-risk individuals. Garvan markedly overestimated risk for high-risk individuals. Until better prediction tools become available, clinicians should prioritise hip BMD, life expectancy, and patient preferences when making decisions about hip fracture prevention in late-life adults.

Reference url

Recent Posts

modifiable risk factors
        

Targeting Shared Risk Pathways to Prevent Stroke, Dementia, and Depression

🧠 What if addressing just a few key lifestyle factors could significantly reduce the risk of stroke, dementia, and depression in older adults?

A recent systematic review has identified 17 **modifiable risk factors**, revealing the interconnected nature of these age-related brain diseases and offering crucial insights for preventive strategies. By focusing on aspects such as blood pressure management, nutrition, and physical activity, we can enhance quality of life for our aging population.

Dive into the article to explore how these findings could shape future healthcare models.

#SyenzaNews #HealthEconomics #HealthcareInnovation #DigitalTransformation

drug price regulation
      

Navigating Drug Price Regulation: Evaluating the Executive Order’s Potential Impacts and Challenges

💊 Curious about the future of drug pricing in the U.S.?

The recent executive order aims to tackle escalating prescription drug costs through measures like international reference pricing and enhanced transparency. However, the implications of these policies could be more complex than anticipated, with potential risks to market access and innovation.

Dive into the article for a detailed analysis of how these regulations could shape the pharmaceutical landscape and what it means for healthcare access in the U.S.

#SyenzaNews #pharmaceuticals #healthcarepolicy

AI Patient Education
       

AI Patient Education: Evaluating ChatGPT and Gemini for Pediatric Condition Materials

🤔 Are AI solutions ready to revolutionize pediatric patient education?

A recent study compared ChatGPT and Gemini in generating educational materials for common pediatric conditions, revealing intriguing insights into content depth, readability, and reliability. While both tools have their merits, there’s significant room for improvement in making AI-generated content accessible and effective for all families.

Curious to learn more about the implications for health literacy and the future of AI in healthcare? Click to read the full article!

#SyenzaNews #AIinHealthcare #HealthTech #DigitalTransformation

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.