Evaluating AI in Healthcare: Implementing Approaches

By Sumona Bose

March 7, 2024

Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds great potential in healthcare by enhancing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. However, a significant gap exists between the development of AI models and their successful integration into clinical practice. Despite the proliferation of AI-based clinical decision support systems (AICDSS), only a meager 2% of these models progress beyond the prototyping stage, leaving the actual clinical impact largely unexplored.

Evaluating Clinical Value through Rigorous Trials

The evaluation of AICDSS through randomised controlled trials (RCTs) stands as a critical step in determining their true clinical value. While some RCTs have been conducted, their outcomes paint a nuanced picture. Although these trials showcase promising statistical performance of AI, nearly half of them fail to demonstrate improved patient outcomes. This discrepancy underscores the complexity of assessing AI solely based on quantitative metrics like accuracy. This may not capture the practical utility of these systems in real-world healthcare settings. Table 1 unpacks the definitions associated with interpreting the patient outcomes. This helps clinicians and researchers shift from the arbitrariness that hinders real-world settings.

Reported in N (%)
Implementation outcomea Clinical explanation Implementation stage RCTs (N = 64) Guidelinesb (N = 5)
Appropriateness Is the AI compatible with the clinical workflow and is it useful? Early 5 (8) 0 (0)
Acceptability Is the AI acceptable, agreeable, or satisfactory for the users? Ongoing 10 (16) 0 (0)
Feasibility Can the AI be successfully used as intended by the manufacturer? Early 16 (25) 0 (0)
Adoption Do the users express the initial decision, or action to try or employ the AI? Ongoing 6 (9) 0 (0)
Fidelity Is the AI implemented as intended by the manufacturer? Ongoing 31 (48) 0 (0)
Implementation cost What is the cost impact of implementing the AI system? Late 4 (6) 0 (0)
Penetration Has the AI been adopted by all groups of trained users? Late 0 (0) 0 (0)
Sustainability Is the AI maintained within ongoing clinical operations over time? Late 1 (2) 0 (0)

Table 1: AI in RCTs, Definitions of implementation outcomes were adapted from the taxonomy of implementation outcomes by Proctor et al (2011). 

The Need for a Holistic Evaluation Approach

A comprehensive understanding of AI’s role in clinical practice necessitates a multi-faceted evaluation strategy. Current guidelines like Developmental and Exploratory Clinical Investigations of DEcision support systems driven by Artificial Intelligence (DECIDE-AI) and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials–Artificial Intelligence (CONSORT-AI), fall short in providing robust measures for assessing AI implementation success. To address this gap, a mixed-methods evaluation approach,  proves invaluable in dissecting the various dimensions of AICDSS implementation.

Bridging the Gap in Implementation Evaluation

Despite the increasing focus on RCTs evaluating AICDSS in clinical settings, a gap exists in the comprehensive evaluation of implementation outcomes.  While metrics like ‘fidelity’ are commonly reported using quantitative measures, aspects such as ‘acceptability’ and ‘appropriateness’ that demand qualitative scrutiny are often overlooked. This imbalance underscores the need for a more holistic approach towards evaluating the implementation of AICDSS, encompassing factors beyond statistical performance. Figure 1 reiterates the comprehensive value of integrating implementation outcomes in AI in healthcare, revealing an innovative future in the field.

figure 2
Figure 1: a In the current situation, AI-CDSS, are clinically deployed, after going through multiple preclinical validations (e.g., external and temporal algorithm validation) to assess their clinical utility and effectiveness. b To enhance comprehension of factors that contributed to successful implementation or failure at the bedside, implementation outcomes should be systematically integrated in future clinical trials evaluating AICDSS in real-world clinical settings. *Implementation outcomes as described by Proctor et al.

Conclusion

While the efficacy of AICDSS in healthcare settings is crucial, understanding the contextual nuances is imperative. Enhanced systematic reporting of implementation outcomes alongside effectiveness metrics can bridge the existing gap in comprehensively assessing the impact of clinical AI. Embracing an inclusive evaluation framework will not only validate the effectiveness of AICDSS but also shed light on the intricate interplay between AI technology and healthcare delivery.

Reference url

Recent Posts

AAP childhood obesity guidelines
     

Caution Advised: Conflicts in AAP Childhood Obesity Guidelines

Are childhood obesity guidelines driving us toward conflict? 🌍 The recent AAP guidelines suggest weight loss medications for children as young as eight, but undisclosed financial ties to drug manufacturers raise serious questions about credibility.

In this article, we dive into the implications of these conflicts and the evidence gaps surrounding pharmaceutical interventions in pediatric care. Transparency and trust are crucial when it comes to the health of our children—let’s explore what needs to change.

Read more to find out how these guidelines could impact families, clinicians, and healthcare policy.

#SyenzaNews #HealthcareInnovation #HealthcarePolicy

implantable glucose device
         

T1 Diabetes Care with an Implantable Glucose Device

🚀 Are we on the brink of a diabetes breakthrough?

A newly developed implantable glucose device from MIT could revolutionize diabetes management, providing an autonomous solution to prevent life-threatening hypoglycemic episodes. This innovative device combines continuous glucose monitoring with responsive hormone delivery, potentially transforming patient care by reducing the need for constant oversight.

Curious about how this technology could reshape diabetes outcomes and healthcare economics? Dive into the full article for a closer look!

#SyenzaNews #HealthTech #HealthEconomics #Innovation

federated learning governance
      

Federated Learning Governance in Healthcare: A Framework for Ethical and Effective Implementation

🔍 Have you considered how federated learning governance can revolutionize healthcare data collaboration?

In our latest article, we explore the critical principles of federated learning governance, emphasizing its role in managing decentralized health data while protecting patient privacy and improving research quality. Learn about the actionable strategies healthcare organizations can implement to navigate the unique challenges that come with this innovative approach.

Dive deeper into the world of federated learning in healthcare and unlock its potential for ethical and effective data use!

#SyenzaNews #AIinHealthcare #DigitalHealth

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

JOIN NEWSLETTER

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.