Enhancing Osteoarthritis Management Through Health Economics

By Melike Belenli Gümüş

August 22, 2024

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA), a prevalent joint disease affecting over 7% globally, leads to chronic pain and reduced mobility. Various factors, including ageing and genetics, contribute to its progression. With cases doubling to 527.8 million globally, OA poses a significant socioeconomic burden, particularly in knee and hip joints. Despite increasing prevalence rates, OA management is often overlooked, necessitating efficient resource allocation for effective treatment. Cost-effectiveness in OA treatments is crucial for optimising healthcare resources. Osteoarthritis management through health economics and health technology assessment (HTA) plays a crucial role in guiding policymakers towards optimal decisions.

Overview of the management of OA

Current OA treatment strategies combine pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, emphasising personalised care for symptom control and improved quality of life. Symptomatic slow-acting drugs, analgesics, and intra-articular treatments are recommended by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO), with a focus on balancing efficacy and safety. Among intra-articular treatments, the new high- and low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (HA-HL) therapy for knee osteoarthritis has shown promising results in recent trials. A single intra-articular injection of HA-HL significantly reduced pain and improved functionality compared to placebo, with effects lasting up to 24 weeks.

Figure 1: Visual analog scale pain reduction in patients with moderate-to-severe symptomatic knee OA treated with a single dose of an innovative intra-articular injection of HA-HL.

Economic Evaluations of OA Interventions

Economic evaluations compare the costs and benefits of different healthcare interventions. They are essential for ensuring that limited resources are used efficiently. Hiligsmann et al. explored the economic evaluations of OA interventions, focusing on trial-based and model-based evaluations. In OA, these evaluations often measure the difference in societal costs against the difference in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

  • Trial-Based Evaluations

Trial-based evaluations collect patient-level data on costs and QALYs during randomised controlled trials. This method has high validity as it uses data from the same population. However, it has limitations, such as a truncated time horizon and restricted generalisability. For example, a 1-year trial may not capture long-term benefits.

  • Model-Based Evaluations

Model-based evaluations use mathematical models to predict long-term health outcomes and costs. These models extrapolate beyond available evidence, allowing for indirect comparisons and generalisation to other settings. However, they are subject to uncertainties, such as parameter uncertainty and assumptions.

HA-HL Therapy from Swiss Healthcare Perspective

A recent randomised controlled trial assessed the cost-effectiveness of an innovative HA formulation for knee OA from a Swiss healthcare perspective. The study demonstrated that the HA-HL formulation was cost-effective compared to placebo, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 27,860 Swiss francs (CHF) per QALY gained. This ICER is significantly below the primary threshold of 91,540 CHF per QALY, which corresponds to US$ 100,000, as well as secondary thresholds of 79,423 CHF per QALY, based on Switzerland’s 2020 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, and 254,307 CHF per QALY, equivalent to three times the GDP per capita. Sensitivity analyses further validated these findings, showing that the ICER remained below all thresholds even when varying cost parameters, thereby confirming the robustness of the results.

Conclusion

HTA has an important role in shaping OA management decisions, emphasising the economic value of interventions. Economic evaluations offer insights into cost-effective treatment options, aiding policymakers in optimising patient care and reducing the socioeconomic burden of OA. Continued advancements in HTA methodologies will further enhance resource allocation decisions, ensuring efficient and equitable healthcare systems for OA management.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Innovations in Haematology Cell Therapy at ASH 2025

By HEOR Staff Writer

December 5, 2025

Advancing Haematology Cell Therapy Innovations at ASH 2025 AstraZeneca is significantly advancing haematology cell therapy with its largest-ever presence at the 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and E...
Advancing EU Health Technology Assessment: Key Priorities in the HTACG Draft Annual Work Programm...

By João L. Carapinha

December 4, 2025

How will the EU Health Technology Assessment framework evolve in 2026 to improve clinical evaluations for cancer treatments and advanced therapies? The EU Health Technology Assessment (HTA) initiative coordinates standardized reviews of medicines and devices across Member States, thereby boosting...
WHO Guidelines Set New Standard for GLP-1 Obesity Therapies in Adults
What does the latest WHO guideline reveal about GLP-1 obesity therapies, as released in December 2025? This landmark document establishes the first global standards for integrating glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and GIP/GLP-1 dual agonists into chronic obesity management, treat...