Economic Evaluations for Dementia Interventions

By Melike Belenli Gümüş

June 3, 2024

Introduction

Dementia presents a significant global healthcare challenge, impacting millions and straining resources. By 2050, the number of individuals affected is projected to reach 139 million. The economic burden is substantial, with costs expected to triple by 2030. Despite available treatments, access barriers persist. Economic evaluations for dementia interventions play a crucial role in resource allocation decisions, offering insights into intervention effectiveness.

Twenty-three studies with the majority being cost-utility analyses were comprised within the scope of a review. The included studies, which were conducted from February 2018 to August 2022, underwent quality assessment using the Philips checklist and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist. Various interventions were covered, including pharmacological, non-pharmacological, prevention, diagnostic, and integrated strategies. Markov transition models were commonly employed, with several interventions reported as cost-effective. However, the quality of reporting in the Methods and Results sections was suboptimal in most studies, highlighting areas for improvement in methodology and reporting standards.

Diversifying Intervention Approaches

While pharmacological treatments have been the focus, non-pharmacological strategies are also gaining recognition. However, research bias towards pharmacological interventions remains, highlighting the need for a balanced approach. Incorporating long-term outcomes and considering early-stage interventions are vital for comprehensive dementia management.

Global Disparities and Model Structures

Studies predominantly focus on high-income countries, indicating a need for broader geographical representation. Markov models are commonly used due to the chronic nature of dementia, with limited utilization of discrete-event simulation (DES) models. Transparent reporting of model assumptions and validation processes is essential for reliable results.

Addressing Methodological Gaps

Engaging stakeholders, including patients and caregivers, in model development enhances relevance and acceptance. While societal perspectives are crucial for comprehensive evaluations, their inclusion remains limited. Clear characterization of health states and consideration of multi-attribute measures are essential for accurate assessments.

Utility Measurement Challenges

Utility measurement methods lack detailed reporting, impacting the reliability of comparisons. The use of EQ-5D values is prevalent but may not capture the full spectrum of dementia-related health impacts. Incorporating condition-specific measures and distinguishing between self and proxy reports can enhance assessment accuracy.

Conclusions

This review provides valuable insights into model-based economic evaluations for dementia interventions, highlighting areas for improvement in methodology and reporting standards. By addressing existing gaps and methodological weaknesses, future studies can contribute significantly to optimizing dementia management strategies globally.

Reference url

Recent Posts

oral health Africa
    

Oral Health in Africa: Promoting Collaborative Solutions

🦷 Is oral health taking a back seat in public health discussions in Africa?

A new article reveals alarming statistics about the high prevalence of untreated dental diseases across the continent and a critical shortage of oral health professionals. It emphasizes the urgent need for collaborative action among healthcare providers and policy-makers to integrate oral health into broader public health frameworks.

Discover how strengthening partnerships can pave the way for improved health outcomes and resource allocation in oral health.

#SyenzaNews #globalhealth #HealthEconomics

tislelizumab NSCLC treatment
        

Early Benefit Assessment of Tislelizumab NSCLC Treatment: Insights and Implications

🧐 How is the evolving treatment landscape for NSCLC affecting patient access to tislelizumab?

The German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) has launched an early benefit assessment for tislelizumab as a second-line treatment for adults with advanced NSCLC. This assessment notably focuses on PD-L1 negative patients and highlights the need for additional data to substantiate its value amidst a shifting emphasis on first-line immunotherapy.

Explore the nuances of this assessment and its implications for future research and market access in the full article.

#SyenzaNews #oncology #MarketAccess

colorectal cancer screening
    

Advances in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Access and Cost

🚀 Is blood-based screening redefining colorectal cancer detection?

The Shield blood test offers a non-invasive alternative to colonoscopy—boosting screening uptake, but raising questions around effectiveness and value.

🔍 Discover how this innovation could reshape patient care, payer strategy, and health system costs.

#SyenzaNews #HealthcareInnovation #CostEffectiveness #DigitalTransformation

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.