Disparities in HPV Vaccination by Health Care Facility Type
By Staff Writer
August 12, 2024
Introduction
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a significant public health concern in the United States. Nearly one in two people aged 15 to 59 years are infected with at least one type of HPV. HPV is linked to almost all cervical cancers, 90% of anal cancers, and a significant percentage of other cancers. Vaccination against HPV is the primary prevention strategy, with the potential to prevent over 90% of these cancers. However, vaccination rates remain below the Healthy People 2030 goal of 80% completion among adolescents aged 13 to 15 years.
HPV Vaccination Rates and Recommendations
Despite the proven efficacy and safety of the HPV vaccine, immunisation rates are lower than other routine vaccinations. As of 2021, 76.9% of adolescents aged 13 to 17 years received at least one dose, but only 61.7% completed the series. Clinician recommendation is the strongest factor in HPV vaccine uptake. However, differences exist in vaccination rates and clinician recommendations based on healthcare settings.
The Role of Healthcare Facilities
HPV vaccines are administered at various healthcare facilities, including public health centres, hospitals, and private facilities. Public health centres serve racially and ethnically diverse populations, often with a higher prevalence of minority patients. These centres play a crucial role in addressing healthcare disparities. However, adolescents receiving vaccinations at public facilities have lower odds of initiating and completing the HPV vaccine series compared to those at private facilities. This difference may be partly explained by the geographic distribution of facilities, with private facilities more common in urban areas and public facilities in rural areas.
Figure 1. Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation and Completion and Clinician Recommendation Prevalence by Health Care Facility Type
Geographic and Socioeconomic Factors
Rural areas often face a shortage of healthcare practitioners, who may prioritise urgent care over preventive services. Moreover, rural residents may encounter specific challenges, such as travel distance and transportation problems, which hinder access to preventive healthcare. Adolescents in rural areas have lower HPV vaccination rates compared to urban counterparts. Efforts to ensure rural healthcare practitioners have the time, resources, and training to educate parents about HPV vaccination could increase uptake.
Insurance and Healthcare Coverage
Another factor influencing HPV vaccination rates is the type of healthcare coverage. Parents of adolescents with private insurance may seek care in private clinics, while those with public insurance or no insurance may rely on public facilities. Vaccination coverage is significantly lower among uninsured adolescents compared to those with private insurance. The Vaccines for Children (VFC) program offers free vaccines to eligible adolescents, but lack of awareness and misconceptions about the program can be barriers. Increasing parental awareness and screening patients for vaccine eligibility could improve vaccination coverage among uninsured adolescents.
Conclusion
This study highlights the disparities in HPV vaccination rates based on healthcare facility type. Adolescents receiving vaccinations at private facilities have higher rates of vaccine initiation and completion compared to those at public facilities. Efforts to reduce these disparities should focus on increasing clinician participation in promoting HPV vaccination, especially in public facilities. Enhancing awareness about HPV, its associated cancer risks, and the benefits of vaccination is crucial. By addressing these disparities, we can improve HPV vaccination rates and protect more adolescents from HPV-related cancers
💡 Is prevention really saving us money in healthcare?
In their thought-provoking article, “Can Prevention Save Money?”, Baicker and Chandra challenge the prevailing notion that preventive health measures always reduce costs. They argue that while prevention can enhance health outcomes, it often leads to increased spending upfront, and the key lies in evaluating these programs based on their cost-effectiveness instead of expecting them to save money outright.
Curious about the real financial implications of preventive care? Dive into the full analysis to uncover the nuances!
🚀 Are we on the brink of a new era in drug approval?
The FDA’s new AI initiative is set to reshape how we evaluate new therapies by dramatically speeding up the review process. With generative AI tools already cutting down review times from days to mere minutes, this breakthrough will not only enhance efficiency but also enable scientists to focus on more impactful work.
Curious about the implications for market access, patient outcomes, and health economics? Dive into the full article to explore how the future of pharmaceutical approvals is being transformed!
🌍 Are we on the brink of a new era in Hepatitis C treatment?
Atea Pharmaceuticals is hosting a virtual KOL panel on May 14, 2025, featuring top experts discussing the challenges faced by HCV patients and sharing insights from the promising results of their Phase 2 study on bemnifosbuvir and ruzasvir. This could be a game-changer in advancing HCV treatments through ongoing Phase 3 trials.
Don’t miss out on how these developments might reshape the future landscape for HCV patients! Click to read more about the panel and the innovative therapies in the pipeline.
#SyenzaNews #biotechnology #HealthEconomics
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.
