Disparities in HPV Vaccination by Health Care Facility Type
By Staff Writer
August 12, 2024
Introduction
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a significant public health concern in the United States. Nearly one in two people aged 15 to 59 years are infected with at least one type of HPV. HPV is linked to almost all cervical cancers, 90% of anal cancers, and a significant percentage of other cancers. Vaccination against HPV is the primary prevention strategy, with the potential to prevent over 90% of these cancers. However, vaccination rates remain below the Healthy People 2030 goal of 80% completion among adolescents aged 13 to 15 years.
HPV Vaccination Rates and Recommendations
Despite the proven efficacy and safety of the HPV vaccine, immunisation rates are lower than other routine vaccinations. As of 2021, 76.9% of adolescents aged 13 to 17 years received at least one dose, but only 61.7% completed the series. Clinician recommendation is the strongest factor in HPV vaccine uptake. However, differences exist in vaccination rates and clinician recommendations based on healthcare settings.
The Role of Healthcare Facilities
HPV vaccines are administered at various healthcare facilities, including public health centres, hospitals, and private facilities. Public health centres serve racially and ethnically diverse populations, often with a higher prevalence of minority patients. These centres play a crucial role in addressing healthcare disparities. However, adolescents receiving vaccinations at public facilities have lower odds of initiating and completing the HPV vaccine series compared to those at private facilities. This difference may be partly explained by the geographic distribution of facilities, with private facilities more common in urban areas and public facilities in rural areas.
Figure 1. Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Initiation and Completion and Clinician Recommendation Prevalence by Health Care Facility Type
Geographic and Socioeconomic Factors
Rural areas often face a shortage of healthcare practitioners, who may prioritise urgent care over preventive services. Moreover, rural residents may encounter specific challenges, such as travel distance and transportation problems, which hinder access to preventive healthcare. Adolescents in rural areas have lower HPV vaccination rates compared to urban counterparts. Efforts to ensure rural healthcare practitioners have the time, resources, and training to educate parents about HPV vaccination could increase uptake.
Insurance and Healthcare Coverage
Another factor influencing HPV vaccination rates is the type of healthcare coverage. Parents of adolescents with private insurance may seek care in private clinics, while those with public insurance or no insurance may rely on public facilities. Vaccination coverage is significantly lower among uninsured adolescents compared to those with private insurance. The Vaccines for Children (VFC) program offers free vaccines to eligible adolescents, but lack of awareness and misconceptions about the program can be barriers. Increasing parental awareness and screening patients for vaccine eligibility could improve vaccination coverage among uninsured adolescents.
Conclusion
This study highlights the disparities in HPV vaccination rates based on healthcare facility type. Adolescents receiving vaccinations at private facilities have higher rates of vaccine initiation and completion compared to those at public facilities. Efforts to reduce these disparities should focus on increasing clinician participation in promoting HPV vaccination, especially in public facilities. Enhancing awareness about HPV, its associated cancer risks, and the benefits of vaccination is crucial. By addressing these disparities, we can improve HPV vaccination rates and protect more adolescents from HPV-related cancers
🚨 *What does the U.S. withdrawing from the WHO mean for global health?*
President Trump’s executive order to begin the withdrawal process raises serious concerns about the future of global health security. From financial disparities to a shift in international partnerships, the implications could reshape our collective ability to combat pandemics and health crises.
Dive into our article to understand the potential impacts on health outcomes and the quest for new alliances.
The European Medicines Agency’s PRAC is currently reviewing the potential risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) associated with semaglutide-containing medicines, including popular treatments like Ozempic and Wegovy. With recent studies yielding conflicting evidence, this review is crucial for patient safety and the future of these therapies.
Read the full article to understand the implications and what this could mean for healthcare providers and patients alike!
💡 *Are single-visit cervical cancer screenings the key to better health outcomes in high HIV prevalence areas?*
A recent study from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa reveals that repeat single-visit cervical cancer screening using HPV DNA testing is not only the most effective but also the most cost-effective approach for women living with HIV. This aligns with WHO recommendations for comprehensive cervical cancer elimination strategies.
Explore the insights and implications of this vital research that could transform cervical cancer prevention in resource-limited settings.
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.
