Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Endometrial Cancer
By Melike Belenli Gümüş
July 29, 2024
Introduction
Endometrial cancer (EC) remains a significant health concern in the US, with 66,200 new cases and 13,030 deaths projected for 2023. The cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like pembrolizumab and dostarlimab in treating advanced EC is crucial for healthcare decision-making. A recent study published in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology examines the economic viability of these treatments, focusing on their impact on survival rates and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
The Burden of Endometrial Cancer
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological malignancy in the US. Despite early-stage diagnosis in 67% of patients, 10-15% present with advanced disease, showing a 5-year survival rate of 15-17%. The prognosis varies significantly based on the molecular subtype of the tumour. Approximately 80% of patients have mismatch repair-proficient microsatellite-stable (pMMR-MSS) tumours, while 30% have mismatch repair-deficient microsatellite instability-high (dMMR-MSI-H) tumours.
Treatment Options and Survival Outcomes
First-line treatment for advanced EC typically involves carboplatin plus paclitaxel. However, the prognosis remains poor, with median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) rates of just 1 and 3 years, respectively. Recent advancements in ICIs, particularly pembrolizumab and dostarlimab, have shown promise in improving survival outcomes. Two large phase 3 trials, RUBY and NRG-GY018, demonstrated significant benefits of combining ICIs with chemotherapy.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Zhu et al. developed a model to compare the cost-effectiveness of dostarlimab plus chemotherapy (DC), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (PC), and chemotherapy alone. The model used a 20-year time horizon and considered various costs, including drug administration, follow-up, monitoring, and adverse event management. The primary outcomes included total costs, life-years (LYs), QALYs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Key Findings
The analysis revealed that DC and PC treatments significantly improved survival outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone. For pMMR-MSS patients, DC treatment extended survival by 1.76 LYs and provided an additional 1.38 QALYs at an ICER of $234,527/QALY. In contrast, PC treatment extended survival by 0.31 LYs and provided an additional 0.23 QALYs at an ICER of $974,177/QALY.
For dMMR-MSI-H patients, DC treatment extended survival by 5.52 LYs and provided an additional 4.36 QALYs at an ICER of $135,165/QALY. PC treatment extended survival by 2.69 LYs and provided an additional 2.15 QALYs at an ICER of $266,423/QALY. The cost-effectiveness of DC compared to PC was $86,671/QALY for pMMR-MSS patients and $7,866/QALY for dMMR-MSI-H patients.
Based on recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO) and prior publications, willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold waws set to $150,000/QALY to assess the cost-effectiveness of DC and PC treatments for advanced EC. The findings suggest that DC is the most cost-effective option for the dMMR-MSI-H population and may also be justified for the pMMR-MSS population based on the health benefits it provides. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve demonstrated that the cost-effectiveness of DC treatment increases as the WTP threshold is raised.
Figure 1: The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for DC, PC, and chemotherapy strategy in the pMMR-MSS population (A) and dMMR-MSI-H population (B), respectively.
Sensitivity and Subgroup Analyses
Sensitivity analyses indicated that the prices of ICIs, costs of adverse event management, and risk of adverse events significantly influenced ICER results. However, these variables did not alter the overall conclusions. Subgroup analyses for the dMMR-MSI-H population showed consistent benefits across different patient groups.
Figure 2: The one-way sensitivity analyses for DC strategy compared to PC strategy in the pMMR-MSS population (A) and dMMR-MSI-H population (B), respectively.
Conclusion
The cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating advanced endometrial cancer varies based on the molecular subtype of the tumour. While both DC and PC treatments offer significant survival benefits, DC appears more cost-effective, particularly for dMMR-MSI-H patients. These findings can guide clinicians, policymakers, and patients in making informed healthcare decisions.
How can innovative models transform diabetes care in South Africa?
Discover how Discovery Health’s shared-value program is not only improving patient outcomes through enhanced glycemic control, but also reducing healthcare costs. This strategic approach is making significant strides in diabetes management, setting a precedent for future healthcare innovations.
Curious to learn more? Dive into the full article for an in-depth look at the program’s impact!
Did you know that Toombak use is a leading risk factor for oral cancer in East Africa?
A recent scoping review sheds light on the shocking prevalence of oral cancer in the region, emphasising the urgent need for public health interventions and improved early detection strategies. Enhancing awareness around risk factors like Toombak, tobacco, and alcohol for tackling this growing health crisis.
Curious about the key insights and their implications for health economics? Look into the full article to find out more!
Are you still reacting to pharmaceutical patent expirations with layoffs and litigation, or are you ready to engineer a strategy that turns the patent cliff into your next competitive edge?
Patent expirations don’t have to derail your pharma portfolio. Learn how to outmaneuver generics and transform challenges into advantages. Dive into our latest insights and take control today.
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.
How can innovative models transform diabetes care in South Africa?
Did you know that Toombak use is a leading risk factor for oral cancer in East Africa? 
Are you still reacting to pharmaceutical patent expirations with layoffs and litigation, or are you ready to engineer a strategy that turns the patent cliff into your next competitive edge? 