Cost-Effective Interventions for HIV, Malaria, Syphilis, and TB in 128 Countries

By Rene Pretorius

April 14, 2025

cost-effectiveness interventions HIV

Limited healthcare budgets demand smart investments. Low- and middle-income countries battle HIV/AIDS, malaria, syphilis, and tuberculosis. A recent study ranks cost-effective interventions. It uses incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to measure cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. The analysis predicts ICERs for 14 interventions across 128 countries. It factors in GDP per capita and disease burden. Country-specific league tables guide funding priorities. Here are the key findings.

Key Insights

Most Cost-Effective Interventions

  • Antenatal Syphilis Screening: Tops the list in 81 countries. Median ICER ranges from $3 in Equatorial Guinea to $3473 in Ukraine. It prevents congenital syphilis at low cost.
  • Chemotherapy for Drug-Susceptible TB: Leads in 23 countries, second in 59. Median ICER is $46, reflecting high efficacy and low costs.
  • Malaria Prevention (Pregnant Women): Excels in Nigeria and beyond. Low ICERs stem from high burden and affordable treatment.
  • Malaria Prevention (Infants): Matches pregnant women’s treatment. It shines in high-burden areas like Sudan.
  • Option B+ (Lifelong ART for Pregnant Women): Ranks third in 15 countries. Median ICER ranges from $81 in Somalia to $2296 in Maldives. It curbs mother-to-child HIV transmission.

Least Cost-Effective Interventions

  • PrEP for Men Who Have Sex with Men: Highest ICER in 116 countries, from $2326 in Lesotho to $53559 in Maldives. High drug costs limit value.
  • PrEP for Heterosexuals Aged 10+: Second highest in 115 countries. Median ICER spans $1729 in Lesotho to $43765 in North Macedonia.
  • ART for Prevention (Aged 0-9): High ICERs, like in Sudan, due to low disease burden and costly treatment.
  • ART for Prevention (Aged 10+): Often exceeds thresholds, as in India, due to long-term costs.
  • Xpert TB Test: Costly in places like Nigeria. It has less impact on DALYs than treatments.

Conclusion

This study shapes smarter health investments. Antenatal syphilis screening and TB chemotherapy deliver big results affordably. PrEP, though vital, needs targeted use due to high costs. Country-specific tables align funding with local needs. Decision-makers can boost health outcomes despite tight budgets. This approach drives efficiency and equity.

Reference url

Recent Posts

TrumpRx.gov expansion
TrumpRx.gov Expansion: Enhancing Medication Price Transparency and Competition

By João L. Carapinha

May 22, 2026

TrumpRx.gov expansion marks a major step toward greater medication price transparency, as detailed in President Donald J. Trump’s announcement to list more than 600 generic drugs on the platform. Patients can now compare competitive cash prices from Amazon Pharmacy, Cost Plus Drugs, and GoodRx fo...
First-in-Human Trials
First-in-Human Trials: Foundations and Market Implications in Health Economics

By HEOR Staff Writer

May 21, 2026

First-in-Human Trials mark the initial transition of a drug candidate from extensive preclinical research into human subjects, supplying the earliest clinical evidence on safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics to inform later development stages. These studies rely on a comprehensive found...
Strategic Purchasing Healthcare
Transforming Healthcare Value: Strategic Purchasing in South Africa

By João L. Carapinha

May 20, 2026

Strategic Purchasing Healthcare offers a pathway for South Africa’s healthcare system to deliver improved patient outcomes amid constrained resources, where traditional passive purchasing models relying on historical budgets or uncapped fee-for-service payments have fallen short in prioritising e...