
As healthcare costs continue to rise, accurate cost-effectiveness estimates are crucial. However, estimating the costs and outcomes of different interventions is complicated by uncertainty.
In model-based health economic evaluations (HEEs), uncertainty can arise from limited data, methodological limitations, and variability in clinical outcomes.
A recent review identified 80 methods for identifying, analyzing, and communicating uncertainty in HEEs. Quantifying uncertainty wherever possible is crucial to ensure accurate and unbiased cost-effectiveness estimates, ultimately leading to optimal allocation of healthcare resources
Recent Posts

Cancer Productivity Disparities in the Asia-Pacific Region
New research exposes a deepening divide in cancer productivity Asia-Pacific, where middle-income countries face rapidly escalating productivity losses from premature cancer deaths and disability, while high-income economies have begun to stabilise their burdens. Between 2010 and 2022, indirect ec...

Generative AI Diagnosis in Neurology Enhances Non-Specialist Accuracy
Generative AI diagnosis is stepping into neurology with striking results. In a new study, ChatGPT-4o reached 65.5% accuracy for the correct leading diagnosis in challenging polyneuropathy cases, statistically matching non-specialist neurologists (63%) while trailing specialists (74%). The model o...

Enhancing Tuberculosis Outcomes Through Counselling Incentives
Tuberculosis counselling incentives that combine conditional cash transfers with structured pre- and post-test counselling are proving highly effective at overcoming socioeconomic barriers to treatment adherence. This integrated strategy reduces long-term disease transmission while requiring only...