
As healthcare costs continue to rise, accurate cost-effectiveness estimates are crucial. However, estimating the costs and outcomes of different interventions is complicated by uncertainty.
In model-based health economic evaluations (HEEs), uncertainty can arise from limited data, methodological limitations, and variability in clinical outcomes.
A recent review identified 80 methods for identifying, analyzing, and communicating uncertainty in HEEs. Quantifying uncertainty wherever possible is crucial to ensure accurate and unbiased cost-effectiveness estimates, ultimately leading to optimal allocation of healthcare resources
Recent Posts
Accelerating Patient Access: MHRA NICE Alignment Initiative
MHRA NICE alignment introduces a groundbreaking pathway launching on 1 April 2026, synchronizing the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)'s licensing with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)'s value assessments. This enables new medicines to reach pa...
TAVI Reimbursement Expansion for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Patients: A New Era in Cardiovascular...
The TAVI reimbursement expansion announced by Zorginstituut Nederland on March 10, 2026, includes transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in...
PRIME Scheme Evaluation: Insights from Enhanced Development Tools Pilot
The PRIME Scheme Evaluation of the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) PRIority Medicines (PRIME), launched in 2016, confirms early and enhanced regulatory support accelerates medicines for unmet needs. A two-year pilot (April 2023–March 2025) tested three new features—regulatory roadmap and produc...