
A review conducted by INESSS highlights the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital health solutions, as well as frameworks used for evaluating these technologies. The consultation with patients and citizens highlights issues such as equity of access, accessibility and security of personal health data, and training and support of users. The study shows the heterogeneity of approaches underlying their assessment in practice and emphasizes the need for strategies tailored to users’ needs.
Recent Posts
Closing the East-West Divide: Addressing Healthcare Investment Disparities in Central and Eastern...
A recent study commissioned by EFPIA and authored by leading CEE academics—Dr. Slaveyko Djambazov, Dr. Luka Voncina, Dr. Aleš Rod, and Dr. Marcin Czech—reveals that despite accelerated public health spending growth in several CEE countries, structural underinvestment persists. This produces marke...
Utah’s AI Medication Prescribing Risks: Navigating the Challenges of Autonomous Systems
In this update we examine how Utah’s groundbreaking partnership with an AI company has introduced serious AI medication prescribing risks by authorizing unsupervised prescribing of nearly 200 medications. In January 2026, Utah partnered with Doctronic to deploy the first system in the United S...
Inequality-Adjusted ICER: Enhancing Cost-Effectiveness in Health Technology Evaluation
The inequality-adjusted ICER offers a practical way to embed explicit trade-offs between maximising total population health and reducing health inequality directly into cost-effectiveness analysis. By dividing the conventional ICER by an inequality-adjusted ICER, analysts derive a health inequali...