Antimicrobial Resistance Cost in Two Ghanaian Hospitals

By HEOR Staff Writer

January 8, 2024

Antimicrobial Resistance Costs

Antimicrobial Resistance Costs: A Burden on Healthcare Providers

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antimicrobial resistance costs are a global challenge with significant implications for healthcare providers. A recent study conducted in two public tertiary hospitals in Ghana, a lower-middle-income setting, quantified the healthcare provider costs (HPCs) due to AMR using both aggregated ingredient costing and step-down costing approaches. The results reveal that AMR patients demand more time and resources from healthcare providers than patients infected with susceptible bacteria or uninfected patients.

The Direct Impact of AMR on Hospitals

The study found that if AMR could be avoided, the extra 5 bed days allocated for treating an estimated 740 AMR patients annually at both hospitals would free up 3700 bed days, allowing for the admission of an additional 451 patients. Moreover, doctors spend an extra 7 hours at Hospital 1 and 3 hours at Hospital 2 caring for each AMR patient admitted to the hospital within a 30-day data collection period.

The Cost of AMR

The research also highlighted the variation in costs due to AMR causative pathogens. For instance, treating each patient with MRSA bloodstream infections at Hospital 1 was approximately 33% higher than treating K. pneumoniae and 16% higher than E. coli bloodstream infections resistant to 3GC. The provider cost of treating AMR was highest for the medical emergency unit due to its limited capacity to treat patients with severe and emergency health conditions compared to the general medical unit.

Mitigating AMR: A Matter of Urgency

The findings underscore the urgent need for healthcare providers and policymakers to focus on AMR mitigation measures. Such measures may include general infection prevention and control, effective antibiotic regulation, and adherence to WHO’s access, watch and reserve (AWaRe) recommendation for antibiotic prescription and therapy. The study also advocates for demand-driven strategies, such as point-of-care education regarding antibiotic use and resistance’s health and economic implications, and supply-driven interventions like hospital-wide antibiotic restriction policy implementation.

In conclusion, AMR imposes significant costs on healthcare providers, particularly in lower-middle-income settings. These costs can be avoided through a myriad of infection prevention and control strategies, thus making a strong case for investment in AMR mitigation strategies.

Reference url

Recent Posts

mifepristone safety study
Mifepristone Safety Study: Ensuring Continued Regulatory Oversight

By João L. Carapinha

June 6, 2026

The mifepristone safety study launched by the FDA in April 2026 is actively collecting high-quality real-world data to determine whether the current Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program still strikes the right balance between clinical benefits and potential harms. S...
HIV prevention access strategies
HIV Prevention Access Strategies Through Collaborative Partnerships in South Africa

By João L. Carapinha

June 6, 2026

HIV prevention access strategies have reached a pivotal moment in South Africa with the imminent launch of lenacapavir, a long-acting injectable administered twice yearly. This coordinated effort directly confronts the country’s immense HIV burden, including 7.8 million people living with the vir...
cancer productivity Asia-Pacific
Cancer Productivity Disparities in the Asia-Pacific Region

By João L. Carapinha

June 5, 2026

New research exposes a deepening divide in cancer productivity Asia-Pacific, where middle-income countries face rapidly escalating productivity losses from premature cancer deaths and disability, while high-income economies have begun to stabilise their burdens. Between 2010 and 2022, indirect ec...