A Value Framework for Next-Generation Sequencing in Europe: Access to Precision Medicine
By Melike Belenli Gümüş
August 21, 2024
Introduction
Precision medicine stands as a guiding light in cancer care, tailoring treatments to tumour genetics. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) offer a significant advancement in personalised therapies, outperforming conventional treatments. However, the promise of precision medicine remains unmet without widespread access to essential biomarker testing. To ensure its effective implementation, a robust value framework is essential. A recent article, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, explores the development of a value framework for NGS in Europe, highlighting key criteria and stakeholder consensus.
Bridging the Gap: Value Assessment for Precision Medicine
Traditional Health Technology Assessments (HTAs) are inadequate in evaluating advanced diagnostics like NGS/CGP. These technologies, crucial for treatment decisions, demand a nuanced approach beyond conventional efficacy and safety parameters. The evolving nature of these tests post-approval poses unique regulatory and reimbursement challenges, necessitating adaptable assessment methods.
Despite endorsements from medical societies and initiatives like the EU Beating Cancer Plan, the adoption of NGS in Europe falls behind. Current practices analyse an insufficient percentage of necessary specimens, hindered by funding complexities and unclear value assessments. To fully realise the potential of NGS/CGP technologies, holistic Value Assessment Frameworks (VAFs) are mandatory.
Shaping the Future: A Collaborative Value Framework
A collaborative effort between the London School of Economics (LSE) and the Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS) aimed to adapt a comprehensive VAF for NGS/CGP diagnostics in European oncology. This innovative framework, rooted in stakeholder insights, seeks to address the intricate value dimensions of these advanced diagnostic tools.
Exploring the preferences of diverse healthcare stakeholders, this research uncovers a strong consensus on key criteria, guiding the development of a novel co-created value framework. Addressing the fragmented adoption of NGS/CGP diagnostics in Europe, the study highlights the need for standardisation and equitable access across regions.
Final Framework and Key Findings
The final framework consisted of 23 ‘essential’ sub-criteria and four ‘complementary’ sub-criteria. Two sub-criteria were excluded due to not meeting the inclusion criteria. The framework’s development involved 81 European participants, with a 79% retention rate.
Figure 1: Final Framework.
Embracing Change: Future Directions in Precision Medicine
As precision medicine evolves, the need for a standardised European framework for NGS/CGP value assessment becomes essential. Robust data infrastructure and outcomes-based financing models are critical to ensure equitable access and quality care in personalised medicine. By addressing data governance concerns and societal values, this value framework for NGS sets the stage for informed decision-making in oncology.
🚨 *What does the U.S. withdrawing from the WHO mean for global health?*
President Trump’s executive order to begin the withdrawal process raises serious concerns about the future of global health security. From financial disparities to a shift in international partnerships, the implications could reshape our collective ability to combat pandemics and health crises.
Dive into our article to understand the potential impacts on health outcomes and the quest for new alliances.
The European Medicines Agency’s PRAC is currently reviewing the potential risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) associated with semaglutide-containing medicines, including popular treatments like Ozempic and Wegovy. With recent studies yielding conflicting evidence, this review is crucial for patient safety and the future of these therapies.
Read the full article to understand the implications and what this could mean for healthcare providers and patients alike!
💡 *Are single-visit cervical cancer screenings the key to better health outcomes in high HIV prevalence areas?*
A recent study from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa reveals that repeat single-visit cervical cancer screening using HPV DNA testing is not only the most effective but also the most cost-effective approach for women living with HIV. This aligns with WHO recommendations for comprehensive cervical cancer elimination strategies.
Explore the insights and implications of this vital research that could transform cervical cancer prevention in resource-limited settings.
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.
