Tuberculosis Care in Indonesia: A Financial Analysis of Strategic Purchasing in Medan

By Charmi Patel

June 24, 2024

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant public health challenge globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Effective TB control requires not only robust clinical interventions but also efficient health financing mechanisms. Traditional payment models, such as fixed capitation payments, often fall short in addressing the complexities and costs associated with TB diagnosis and treatment. Despite 88.6% National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional) coverage, 38.4% of TB-affected households face catastrophic costs, with out-of-pocket spending exceeding 20% of income due to high TB service expenses, over-referrals to hospitals, and gaps in coverage.

Financial Impact Analysis

Experts developed a budget impact model to assess the cost-effectiveness of strategic purchasing in improving TB reporting and treatment success rates. The model predicts a substantial increase in TB reporting by 63% and successful treatments by 64% under strategic purchasing. Consequently, this would lead to a 60% rise in total spending on TB care. Yet, the cost per patient is expected to drop by 3% with care shifting to cost-effective primary healthcare settings, reflecting increased diagnostic costs.

Results and Implications

The analysis indicates that while strategic purchasing may initially raise overall spending on TB care, it can significantly enhance TB care in Indonesia. By identifying more cases, treating them more effectively, and consequently reducing the cost per patient, strategic purchasing offers a promising avenue for improving TB care delivery. The model projects a 64% surge in TB case notifications and a 64.5% boost in successful treatment under strategic purchasing, thereby leading to advancement of cost-effective care and improving health outcomes.

Table 2: Comparison between the current and proposed scenarios, showing the impact on vertical referrals, confirmed TB cases notified, and TB patients completing treatment.
Table 1: Comparison between the current and proposed scenarios, showing the impact on vertical referrals, confirmed TB cases notified, and TB patients completing treatment.

 

Figure 3: The cost-effectiveness of the proposed strategic health purchasing approach under different scenarios of treatment success rates.
Figure 1: The cost-effectiveness of the proposed strategic health purchasing approach under different scenarios of treatment success rates.

 

Table 5: This table breaks down the costs for different payers (NHI, central and local government, Global Fund, and out-of-pocket) under the current and proposed scenarios, highlighting the financial implications of the new approach.
Table 2: This table breaks down the costs for different payers (NHI, central and local government, Global Fund, and out-of-pocket) under the current and proposed scenarios, highlighting the financial implications of the new approach.

Conclusion

In conclusion, strategic purchasing presents a viable strategy to address Indonesia’s TB burden effectively. By incentivising primary healthcare providers and promoting efficient care, this approach transforms TB accessibility, treatment effectiveness, and cost-efficiency. Furthermore, the financial analysis emphasises strategic purchasing benefits, stressing aligning incentives with quality care for sustainable TB control strategies.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Novo Nordisk performance
      

Business Dynamics: How Novo Nordisk Lost GLP-1 Market Share

🚀 Understand the market dynamics of Novo Nordisk’s GLP-1 Market Share Decline.

A case of demand underestimation, supply chain strain, and competitor agility. Using systems thinking, we unpack the dynamic forces behind Eli Lilly’s surge—and what strategic levers pharma leaders must pull to stay ahead.

#SyenzaNews #PharmaStrategy #MarketDynamics #NovoNordisk #EliLilly #GLP1

Tolebrutinib MS analysis
          

Tolebrutinib MS Analysis: Evaluating Economic Impact in SPMS

💡 Can tolebrutinib reshape the treatment landscape for progressive multiple sclerosis?

A recent report from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review reveals promising insights on tolebrutinib, demonstrating a 31% reduction in disability progression for patients with non-relapsing secondary progressive MS. Yet, mixed outcomes and potential safety concerns raise critical questions about its long-term efficacy and market access.

Explore the nuances of this groundbreaking therapy and its implications for healthcare economics.

#SyenzaNews #HealthEconomics #MarketAccess

allopurinol Marfan syndrome orphan
       

Allopurinol Designated an Orphan Drug for Marfan Syndrome

🌟 What does the EMA’s orphan drug designation for allopurinol mean for those impacted by Marfan syndrome?

This groundbreaking move highlights a significant step forward in tackling rare diseases, offering hope to patients with limited treatment options. Allopurinol, traditionally used for gout, shows promise in addressing life-threatening aortic complications associated with Marfan syndrome, thanks to its antioxidant properties.

Dive into the implications of this development for healthcare innovation, patient access, and the future of rare disease treatment!

#SyenzaNews #HealthEconomics #Innovation #MarketAccess

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.