The Cost of Mental Health Care: A Cost-Sharing Law

By Staff Writer

March 31, 2024

Introduction:

The scarcity of mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) treatment is a significant public health issue in the US, contributing to high levels of morbidity and mortality. Many people with MH/SUDs often hesitate to seek health care due to stigma and the lack of accessible clinicians. For those with commercial insurance, out-of-pocket expenses due to cost-sharing serve as another barrier. This article examines the mental health landscape in the US and the impact of cost-sharing laws on the cost of healthcare, focusing on the New Mexico No Behavioural Health Cost Sharing (NCS) law.

Who Receives Mental Health Care?

Persistent disparities exist in access to mental health care. In 2021, only 47% of US adults with mental illness received any mental health services. Workforce shortages contribute to this issue, with more than half of US residents living in areas short of mental health professionals. Even insured individuals often find it difficult to use their insurance for care, as nearly half of psychiatrists do not accept insurance. In 2021, 55% of people with serious mental illness who needed but did not receive mental health care cited unaffordability as the main barrier. Inadequate insurance payment and coverage was the primary obstacle for an additional 33%.

Towards More Equitable Access

The tradition of private practice psychiatry, coupled with the availability of cash-paying patients, exacerbates mental health workforce shortages, especially when demand outstrips supply. Despite expansions in insurance coverage and legal mandates that health plans include mental health care coverage, out-of-pocket costs remain a significant barrier. In 2021, racial and ethnic disparities in treatment rates were also evident.

The Implications of Cost-Sharing

Cost-sharing, which includes copayments, coinsurance, and deductibles, is designed to curb the overuse of health care. However, for individuals with MH/SUDs, cost-sharing can discourage the use of effective treatments. The RAND Health Insurance experiment in the 1970s demonstrated this, showing that higher cost-sharing led to larger reductions in mental health care than other health care use.

The New Mexico No Behavioural Health Cost Sharing Law

In April 2021, New Mexico passed the NCS law, prohibiting cost-sharing for MH/SUD treatment for individuals with commercial insurance plans. This law was a response to the need to reduce the costs of MH/SUD treatment, given the vast personal and societal costs of these conditions. However, the impact of the law on patient outcomes is yet to be fully understood.

The Impact of the New Mexico No Behavioural Health Cost Sharing Law

In order to lower MH/SUD treatment costs, the NCS was passed. The NCS applies solely to state-regulated commercial insurance plans, including fully insured, employer-sponsored plans, individual market plans, and New Mexico state employee health plans (SEHPs), which cover public school employees. The data suggests that the NCS effectively shielded patients from out-of-pocket spending on medications for MH/SUDs. A recent study discovered that the average out-of-pocket expense for psychotropic medications decreased by $6.37, or 85.6%, when compared to New Mexico federal employees who were not impacted by NCS. However, the overall volume of dispensed MH/SUD prescription drugs did not significantly change.

Conclusion:

New Mexico’s NCS law provides a case study on how legislation can tackle financial obstacles to mental health care. It has effectively cut down out-of-pocket costs for psychotropic drugs. However, the total amount of dispensed MH/SUD prescription drugs hasn’t changed significantly. This situation highlights the complex nature of mental health care access. It’s not just about cost, but also about professional availability and lingering mental health stigma. We have yet to see the law’s effect on non-drug services. Yet, the initial success in lessening the financial strain of medication signals a hopeful beginning. Despite this, the data on mental health care access indicates a long road to equitable mental health care. It’s clear that while laws like NCS can contribute, we need a multi-faceted strategy. This strategy should address workforce shortages, insurance coverage, and societal stigma.

Reference url

Recent Posts

EU Life Sciences Strategy
         

EU Life Sciences Strategy: Paving the Way for Europe’s Leadership by 2030

🚀 Is Europe poised to reclaim its leadership in life sciences by 2030?

The European Commission has unveiled a game-changing strategy aimed at transforming the EU into the world’s leading hub for life sciences, tackling critical challenges in health, biotechnology, and sustainability. With strategic investments and reforms, this initiative promises to bridge the innovation gap and enhance public health outcomes across the continent.

Curious about how these plans will impact the life sciences landscape? Explore the full insights of this exciting strategy!

#SyenzaNews #HealthcareInnovation #DigitalTransformation #Innovation

ticagrelor data integrity
          

Ticagrelor Data Integrity Under Fire: Scrutiny Reveals Flaws in Key Clinical Trials

🔍 Are we truly getting the full story on high-cost medications like ticagrelor?

A recent BMJ investigation has raised alarm bells over the integrity of data from pivotal studies on AstraZeneca’s ticagrelor, revealing significant misreporting and missing data that may undermine its clinical benefits. This exposes critical implications for health economics, regulatory oversight, and market access.

Curious about how these findings could reshape perceptions of drug efficacy and safety? Dive into the full article to uncover the truth behind the numbers.

#SyenzaNews #HealthEconomics #Pharmaceuticals #MarketAccess

self-care public health
    

The Value of Self-Care in Public Health: Insights and Implications for Europe

🌍 Are we overlooking the power of self-care in Europe’s public health strategy?

The rise of self-care public health is reshaping how minor ailments are managed across the continent, leading to remarkable economic and productivity benefits. With annual savings of €36 billion and lifestyle improvements for consumers, self-care is proving to be a game-changer for healthcare systems.

Explore how embracing self-care can alleviate pressure on healthcare providers and enhance individual well-being. Dive into the full article to discover the implications for health economics and public policy!

#SyenzaNews #HealthEconomics #HealthcarePolicy

When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.

Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management. You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.

SPEAK WITH US

CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS

1950 W. Corporate Way, Suite 95478
Anaheim, CA 92801, USA

JOIN NEWSLETTER

© 2025 Syenza™. All rights reserved.