Willingness to Pay for Innovative Oncology Treatments

By HEOR Staff Writer

March 16, 2024

Willingness to pay for innovative oncology treatments

Introduction

Cancer remains a significant global public health concern, with approximately 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million deaths reported worldwide in 2018. Access to innovative oncology treatments is crucial in improving patient prognosis and quality of life. However, the high cost of these treatments often poses a barrier, particularly in lower-middle-income countries like Malaysia. This article explores the willingness of Malaysians to pay for these innovative treatments and how this information can be used to shape more sustainable funding solutions.

The Cost of Oncology Treatment

The financial burden of cancer treatment has seen a dramatic increase over the years. In many instances, the high cost of new oncology medicines that could potentially improve survival rates renders them unaffordable. Consequently, they are not listed in the Ministry of Health Malaysia Formulary. The financial strain often forces patients to pay out-of-pocket to access these new treatments, leading to potential economic hardships.

The Funding Challenge and Need for Innovative Solutions

In Malaysia, several foundations and non-governmental agencies occasionally provide funding assistance for cancer therapies. However, these funds are often insufficient, posing a barrier to early access to innovative oncology medicine. Therefore, there is a pressing need for innovative funding mechanisms involving multiple parties, such as healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, patients, non-government organisations, and other funding bodies.

Willingness to Pay for Innovative Oncology Treatments

A recent study sought to determine whether Malaysians are willing to pay for innovative oncology medicines and the amount they would be willing to pay for early access to treatment. The research was done in three hospitals in Malaysia, and also online from January 2021 to January 2022. Participants were given three hypothetical scenarios where they had to decide how much they would be willing to pay for a new diabetes medicine (IDM), a one-time payment for a new cancer medicine (IOMO), and an annual insurance premium for access to new cancer medicines (IOMI).

Table 1. Mean Willingness to Pay Amount.

The results revealed that on average, for the first model (IDM), people were willing to pay around MYR134.06 per month. The study found that older individuals and those from Sabah/Sarawak were willing to pay a little more. Also, people with higher incomes (over MYR10,001) were willing to pay significantly more.

For the second model (IOMO), the average amount people were willing to pay was MYR279.10 per dose. Here, people with higher incomes again were willing to pay more, and married individuals also tended to pay more.

For the third model (IOMI), the average amount people were willing to pay was MYR150.09 per year. In this case, only those with higher incomes were willing to pay more.

Implications and Conclusion

The results from this study can help shape collaborative funding mechanisms for cancer care in Malaysia. It is essential to introduce appropriate financial screening in public hospitals to categorise patients based on their financial hardship and channel them to suitable financial assistance. Moreover, the results underscore the need for more education and marketing initiatives to highlight the benefits of medical and health insurance, especially for covering innovative cancer medicine.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Joint Scientific Consultation EU
Joint Scientific Consultation EU Strategies for Medical Device Companies

By João L. Carapinha

June 19, 2026

The EU Joint Scientific Consultation gives medical device developers a voluntary route to obtain targeted feedback on clinical evidence plans well before formal Joint Clinical Assessment and national reimbursement decisions. Manufacturers of select high-risk technologies can align their developme...
EU Joint Clinical Assessment
Insights on EU Joint Clinical Assessment for High-Risk Medical Devices

By João L. Carapinha

June 19, 2026

EU Joint Clinical Assessment is a distinct, harmonised process that operates separately from CE marking. It produces comparative clinical evidence on selected high-risk devices to support more consistent national reimbursement decisions across EU member states. Insights from the
LesionAttn Skin Cancer AI
LesionAttn Skin Cancer AI Enhances Fairness in Dermatological Diagnostics

By João L. Carapinha

June 19, 2026

LesionAttn Skin Cancer AI tackles a critical flaw in current skin cancer detection tools: models that unconsciously rely on background skin features differing between men and women, producing unequal accuracy across genders. By steering neural networks to focus on the actual lesion instead of the...