Willingness to Pay for Innovative Oncology Treatments
By Staff Writer
March 16, 2024
Introduction
Cancer remains a significant global public health concern, with approximately 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million deaths reported worldwide in 2018. Access to innovative oncology treatments is crucial in improving patient prognosis and quality of life. However, the high cost of these treatments often poses a barrier, particularly in lower-middle-income countries like Malaysia. This article explores the willingness of Malaysians to pay for these innovative treatments and how this information can be used to shape more sustainable funding solutions.
The Cost of Oncology Treatment
The financial burden of cancer treatment has seen a dramatic increase over the years. In many instances, the high cost of new oncology medicines that could potentially improve survival rates renders them unaffordable. Consequently, they are not listed in the Ministry of Health Malaysia Formulary. The financial strain often forces patients to pay out-of-pocket to access these new treatments, leading to potential economic hardships.
The Funding Challenge and Need for Innovative Solutions
In Malaysia, several foundations and non-governmental agencies occasionally provide funding assistance for cancer therapies. However, these funds are often insufficient, posing a barrier to early access to innovative oncology medicine. Therefore, there is a pressing need for innovative funding mechanisms involving multiple parties, such as healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, patients, non-government organisations, and other funding bodies.
Willingness to Pay for Innovative Oncology Treatments
A recent study sought to determine whether Malaysians are willing to pay for innovative oncology medicines and the amount they would be willing to pay for early access to treatment. The research was done in three hospitals in Malaysia, and also online from January 2021 to January 2022. Participants were given three hypothetical scenarios where they had to decide how much they would be willing to pay for a new diabetes medicine (IDM), a one-time payment for a new cancer medicine (IOMO), and an annual insurance premium for access to new cancer medicines (IOMI).
Table 1. Mean Willingness to Pay Amount.
The results revealed that on average, for the first model (IDM), people were willing to pay around MYR134.06 per month. The study found that older individuals and those from Sabah/Sarawak were willing to pay a little more. Also, people with higher incomes (over MYR10,001) were willing to pay significantly more.
For the second model (IOMO), the average amount people were willing to pay was MYR279.10 per dose. Here, people with higher incomes again were willing to pay more, and married individuals also tended to pay more.
For the third model (IOMI), the average amount people were willing to pay was MYR150.09 per year. In this case, only those with higher incomes were willing to pay more.
Implications and Conclusion
The results from this study can help shape collaborative funding mechanisms for cancer care in Malaysia. It is essential to introduce appropriate financial screening in public hospitals to categorise patients based on their financial hardship and channel them to suitable financial assistance. Moreover, the results underscore the need for more education and marketing initiatives to highlight the benefits of medical and health insurance, especially for covering innovative cancer medicine.
🦷 Is oral health taking a back seat in public health discussions in Africa?
A new article reveals alarming statistics about the high prevalence of untreated dental diseases across the continent and a critical shortage of oral health professionals. It emphasizes the urgent need for collaborative action among healthcare providers and policy-makers to integrate oral health into broader public health frameworks.
Discover how strengthening partnerships can pave the way for improved health outcomes and resource allocation in oral health.
🧐 How is the evolving treatment landscape for NSCLC affecting patient access to tislelizumab?
The German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) has launched an early benefit assessment for tislelizumab as a second-line treatment for adults with advanced NSCLC. This assessment notably focuses on PD-L1 negative patients and highlights the need for additional data to substantiate its value amidst a shifting emphasis on first-line immunotherapy.
Explore the nuances of this assessment and its implications for future research and market access in the full article.
🚀 Is blood-based screening redefining colorectal cancer detection?
The Shield blood test offers a non-invasive alternative to colonoscopy—boosting screening uptake, but raising questions around effectiveness and value.
🔍 Discover how this innovation could reshape patient care, payer strategy, and health system costs.
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.
