The Socioeconomic Impact of Cervical Cancer in the UK
By Staff Writer
March 7, 2024
Introduction
The socioeconomic impact of cervical cancer in the UK is a significant concern and the fourth most common cancer type globally among women. This article, based on a report from the Office of Health Economics (OHE), quantifies that burden and the potential savings from reaching the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) elimination target set in 2020. Currently the disease burden in the UK is more than twice the WHO target of less than 4 cases per 100,000 women.
The Cost of Cervical Cancer
Cervical cancer carries an estimated lifetime cost of £208,086 per case in the UK. This value includes direct healthcare expenses, individual patient costs, and broader societal costs (Figure 3) due to morbidity and mortality. The strain primarily falls on society and families, accounting for 85% of the total burden, with the healthcare system bearing just 8%. The primary factor influencing the overall cost throughout an individual person’s lifetime is the reduction in productivity (Figure 1), amounting to £130,984. This accounts for 63% of the individual burden and is mostly caused by the economic impact of mortality due to cervical cancer.
Figure 1. Lifetime socioeconomic cost per newly diagnosed patient
OOP= Out of pocket
The Socioeconomic Impact of Cervical Cancer in the UK
The total socioeconomic burden of new cervical cancer cases in the UK, at the current incidence rate of 9.7 cases per 100,000, is approximately £691 million. To put this into perspective, this burden equates to about 40% of the UK’s combined spending on immunisation and early detection programmes pre-COVID-19 (£1.7 billion in 2019) or about 8% of the total UK pre-COVID-19 spending on preventative care (£8.3 billion in 2019).
The Potential Savings
If the WHO elimination target were achieved today, there would be an instant 59% reduction in the socioeconomic burden, equivalent to about £406 million. The UK could save around £2.6 billion (Figure 2) compared to taking no action on cervical cancer elimination by achieving the WHO elimination threshold by 2046. This means that the socioeconomic burden of cervical cancer is preventable. However, these savings do not consider the cost required to achieve elimination, such as spending on prevention and control measures like vaccination and screening.
Figure 2. Achieving the WHO elimination target in the UK by 2046 could save £2.6 billion
The Path to Elimination
Achieving elimination requires a comprehensive action plan from the National Health Service (NHS) to overcome barriers to access, education, and awareness while maintaining adequate funding and resources. NHS England’s recent commitment to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040 provides the impetus to improve vaccination and screening coverage and implement a clear strategy to accelerate elimination.
Figure 3. Framework of cervical cancer socioeconomic burden
* Productivity loss quantifications already include tax returns due to workplace absenteeism.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the socioeconomic burden of cervical cancer in the UK, emphasises the urgency for effective intervention strategies to achieve the WHO elimination target by 2046, compared to taking no action. However, these savings must be weighed against the costs of implementing such strategies, including vaccination and screening programs. Therefore, it is crucial for health economists and policymakers to conduct further cost-effectiveness analyses to determine the optimal allocation of resources.
🌟 What does the EMA’s orphan drug designation for allopurinol mean for those impacted by Marfan syndrome?
This groundbreaking move highlights a significant step forward in tackling rare diseases, offering hope to patients with limited treatment options. Allopurinol, traditionally used for gout, shows promise in addressing life-threatening aortic complications associated with Marfan syndrome, thanks to its antioxidant properties.
Dive into the implications of this development for healthcare innovation, patient access, and the future of rare disease treatment!
💡 Are we witnessing a paradigm shift in hemophilia treatment?
The recent recommendation from NICE for marstacimab as a novel therapy for severe hemophilia B is a game-changer. With its ability to provide effective prophylaxis while potentially lowering treatment costs, this could reshape patient care and health economics in this space.
Dive into the implications this has for patients and healthcare providers, and why marstacimab’s approval could be a pivotal moment for hemophilia management.
🌍 Are we witnessing a rise in HPV-related cancer in South Africa?
A recent analysis of data from the South African National Cancer Registry highlights concerning trends: while cervical cancer rates are declining, there’s an alarming rise in non-cervical anogenital cancers. This underscores the urgent need for enhanced cancer prevention and access to efficient healthcare services in the country.
Dive into the findings and explore the implications for health systems and policies.
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.
