The World Health Organization (WHO) has released new guidance on the ethics and governance of large multi-modal models (LMMs), which are generative AI technologies that have the potential to improve healthcare outcomes. The guidance includes over 40 recommendations for governments, technology companies, and healthcare providers to ensure the appropriate use of LMMs. LMMs are unique in their ability to accept various types of data inputs, such as text, videos, and images, and generate diverse outputs. They mimic human communication and can perform tasks that they were not explicitly programmed to do. These technologies have been adopted at an unprecedented rate, with platforms like ChatGPT, Bard, and Bert gaining popularity in 2023. This article will discuss WHO’s Guidance of Ethics and Governance AI Usage.
Guiding AI’s Role in Healthcare
The potential benefits of LMMs in healthcare are vast. They can be used for diagnosis and clinical care, patient-guided use, clerical and administrative tasks, medical and nursing education, and scientific research and drug development. However, there are also risks associated with the use of LMMs. They can produce false, inaccurate, biased, or incomplete statements. These could harm individuals relying on this information for their health decisions. LMMs may also be trained on poor quality or biased data, leading to potential disparities in healthcare outcomes.
Figure 1: WHO Guidance on Ethics and Governance on AI for Health
The guidance also highlights broader risks to health systems, such as the accessibility and affordability of the best-performing LMMs. There is a concern that healthcare professionals and patients may develop “automation bias,” relying too heavily on LMMs and overlooking errors or improperly delegating difficult choices to these technologies. Additionally, LMMs are vulnerable to cybersecurity risks, which could compromise patient information and the trustworthiness of these algorithms.
Ensuring a multi-stakeholder framework of AI
To ensure the safe and effective use of LMMs, the WHO emphasizes the need for engagement from various stakeholders, including governments, technology companies, healthcare providers, patients, and civil society. Governments have a primary responsibility to set standards for the development and deployment of LMMs, including their oversight and regulation. The guidance recommends that governments invest in public infrastructure and provide access to computing power and public data sets while adhering to ethical principles and values. WHO’s Guidance of Ethics and Governance AI Usage can be considered as an important framework of universal applicability.
Conclusion
Developers of LMMs should involve potential users and stakeholders, including medical providers, researchers, healthcare professionals, and patients, in the design process. LMMs should be designed to perform well-defined tasks with accuracy and reliability, improving the capacity of health systems.
🌟 What does the EMA’s orphan drug designation for allopurinol mean for those impacted by Marfan syndrome?
This groundbreaking move highlights a significant step forward in tackling rare diseases, offering hope to patients with limited treatment options. Allopurinol, traditionally used for gout, shows promise in addressing life-threatening aortic complications associated with Marfan syndrome, thanks to its antioxidant properties.
Dive into the implications of this development for healthcare innovation, patient access, and the future of rare disease treatment!
💡 Are we witnessing a paradigm shift in hemophilia treatment?
The recent recommendation from NICE for marstacimab as a novel therapy for severe hemophilia B is a game-changer. With its ability to provide effective prophylaxis while potentially lowering treatment costs, this could reshape patient care and health economics in this space.
Dive into the implications this has for patients and healthcare providers, and why marstacimab’s approval could be a pivotal moment for hemophilia management.
🌍 Are we witnessing a rise in HPV-related cancer in South Africa?
A recent analysis of data from the South African National Cancer Registry highlights concerning trends: while cervical cancer rates are declining, there’s an alarming rise in non-cervical anogenital cancers. This underscores the urgent need for enhanced cancer prevention and access to efficient healthcare services in the country.
Dive into the findings and explore the implications for health systems and policies.
When you partner with Syenza, it’s like a Nuclear Fusion.
Our expertise are combined with yours, and we contribute clinical expertise and advanced degrees in
health policy, health economics, systems analysis, public finance, business, and project management.
You’ll also feel our high-impact global and local perspectives with cultural intelligence.
