Navigating the AI Landscape in Healthcare: Ethics and Access

By Sumona Bose

December 11, 2023

The AI Challenge in Healthcare

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the healthcare sector is a complex endeavour. Life sciences consulting firms are grappling with significant challenges, particularly when it comes to embedding AI-enabled diagnostics into healthcare systems. These challenges are rooted in sociocultural, technological, and institutional subsystems. The medical community’s prevailing ethos, concerns about black-box decision-making, and fear of reputational harm are some of the factors contributing to resistance against AI.

The Response: Stealth Science, Agility, and Digital Ambidexterity

AI providers are responding to these challenges with three key practices: stealth science, agility, and digital ambidexterity. Stealth science involves maintaining opacity around development to safeguard trade secrets and evade regulatory scrutiny. Agility refers to the capacity to adapt to different technical settings and learn from various healthcare environments. Lastly, digital ambidexterity is the pursuit of efficiency and innovation in developing AI technologies.

However, these practices may lead to complexities in technology spread, regulatory challenges, and shifts in healthcare dynamics. It’s clear that the journey towards integrating AI into healthcare is filled with paradoxes, with AI providers having to tread a fine line between acceleration and inertia.

The Ethical Considerations

From policy makers, ethics in access to AI is an important factor to consider. AI providers need to ensure that their practices allow for more latitude in navigating healthcare systems, but this must be balanced against the need for transparency and accountability.

To ensure value-based healthcare, we must address these ethical dilemmas head-on and work towards finding workable solutions. AI consulting firms must work in tandem with healthcare providers and policy-makers to create human-centred solutions that respect the rights and needs of all stakeholders.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Economic Impact of Industry Clinical Trials in Europe

By João L. Carapinha

February 24, 2026

Industry clinical trials in are a vital engine of medical innovation and economic growth, with the European Economic Area (EEA) generating €35.7 billion in Gross Value Added (GVA) in 2025 from these activities. This includes €21.7 billion from direct, indirect, and induced effects, €3.6 billion f...
Economic Burden NSCLC: A Systematic Review of Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization
A recently published systematic literature review synthesizes evidence from 50 publications across 43 studies on the economic burden NSCLC in locally advanced (stage IIIB/C) and metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer, highlighting high healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) rates includ...
Enhancing Systematic Reviews: AI Literature Review Integration for Efficiency and Rigor

By João L. Carapinha

February 23, 2026

AI Literature Review Integration is transforming systematic literature reviews (SLRs), as outlined in this preprint. It provides methodological guidance for incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into SLRs with a human-in-the-loop approa...