Medical Device Procurement: Unravelling the Role of Health Technology Assessment

By Staff Writer

November 13, 2023

The Current State of Health Technology Assessment

Health technology assessment (HTA) in medical device procurement has been instrumental in determining the value of medical devices. However, the unique characteristics of these devices, including frequent iterations and user learning curves, make generalising outcomes challenging. Furthermore, the diverse needs of stakeholders often result in varying views on a technology’s value. Despite the wealth of information available on HTA, a knowledge gap exists regarding its use by non-payer, non-HTA stakeholders in their assessment of medical devices.

Addressing the Gap: The ISPOR Special Interest Group Study

In an attempt to bridge this gap, the ISPOR Medical Devices and Diagnostics Special Interest Group conducted a systematic literature review. These studies were geographically diverse, originating from various locations globally. Two studies each were conducted in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Other studies were based in Italy, Australia, and South Africa. This review aimed to summarise the current evidence base for the criteria used in medical device procurement.A key finding across all studies was the utilisation of decision-making criteria that are generally considered standard elements of HTA. The most common criteria included cost (reported in 100% of the studies), safety (91%), efficacy (82%), cost-effectiveness (64%), and budget impact (36%). The results, however, showed sparse evidence regarding HTA’s use in device purchasing, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions about HTA’s impact on procurement.

Health Technology Assessment in Medical Device Procurement

The use and impact of HTA on treatment decisions vary widely across different geographies, further complicating the process. However, a growing trend towards “mini” or hospital-level HTA, which directly informs procurement decisions, has been observed. Most hospital-level HTA studies reviewed continue to depend on national-level HTA. They also use published systematic reviews to shape their conclusions.

The ISPOR Special Interest Group anticipates that HTA has more impact than their findings suggest, possibly due to a lack of publication incentive among procurement bodies. We need to deepen our research to comprehend the relationship between HTA and procurement better. Encouraging broader, more systemic evidence-based decision making also requires our attention. 

 

Reference url

Recent Posts

Navigating Challenges for Small Countries to Access Innovative Medicines

By João L. Carapinha

July 31, 2025

Access to innovative medicines is a pressing issue for patients in smaller European countries. These nations often face significant barriers in obtaining timely and equitable healthcare solutions. The article "Ensuring access to innovative medicines for patients in smaller countries" (linked belo...
Mental Health Policy Integration: A Cross-Sector Imperative for Well-being and Productivity
The purpose of this update is to review a recent Lancet editorial (linked below) on mental health policy integration in public policy frameworks. The article “Mental health in all policies” emphasizes that mental health influences individual well-being, societal cohesion, and economic productivit...
Novartis Gains Approval for Groundbreaking Malaria Treatment for Infants

By Rene Pretorius

July 30, 2025

In this article we review Swissmedic's approval of Novartis' Coartem Baby. It is the first malaria treatment for infants under 4.5 kilograms. This novel formulation addresses a critical gap in antimalarial care. Existing treatments were unsuitable due to dosing and metabolism concerns in young in...