Tezepelumab as an Add-on Maintenance Treatment for Severe Asthma: Recommendations and Clinical/Economic Impact.

By HEOR Staff Writer

April 25, 2023

Tezepelumab as an add-on maintenance treatment is recommended as an option for severe asthma in people 12 years and over, when treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus another maintenance treatment has failed.

It is recommended only if people:

  • Have had 3 or more exacerbations in the previous year, or
  • Are having maintenance oral corticosteroids.

Tezepelumab should be discontinued if the rate of severe asthma exacerbations, or the maintenance oral corticosteroid dose, have not been reduced by at least 50% at 12 months.

Clinical impact:
Clinical trial results show that tezepelumab, when added to usual treatment, reduces exacerbations and the dose of oral corticosteroids needed, compared with placebo. An indirect comparison of tezepelumab with other biological treatments suggests similar clinical effectiveness, but this is uncertain.

Economic impact:
The cost-effectiveness estimates show that Tezepelumab as an add-on maintenance therapy is cost effective compared with standard care and other biological (benralizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, dupilumab and omalizumab) treatments.

Reference url

Recent Posts

Healthcare Innovation Trends Shaping the Future: Insights from the J.P. Morgan Conference

By HEOR Staff Writer

February 6, 2026

Healthcare Innovation Trends Spotlighted at J.P. Morgan Conference Healthcare innovation trends took center stage at the J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference, the industry's largest global event, where investors, leaders...
Novo Nordisk Growth Projections: Insights on 2025 Performance and 2026 Outlook

By João L. Carapinha

February 4, 2026

Novo Nordisk's company announcement details 2025 financial results and a 2026 outlook, with Novo Nordisk growth projections highlighting 10% sales growth and 6% oper...
AI Healthcare Costs: Navigating Financial Hurdles in Technology Integration
AI healthcare costs pose significant financial challenges for U.S. systems, with upfront expenses from $40,000 for basic tools to over $200,000 for advanced generative models, plus recurring fees for cloud computing and integration. How do these compare to electronic health records (EHRs), and ca...